Seite - 63 - in Entangled Entertainers - Jews and Popular Culture in Fin-de-Siècle Vienna
Bild der Seite - 63 -
Text der Seite - 63 -
Jewish Volkssänger and Musical Performers in Vienna around 1900 | 63
Th
e plays that the Budapest Orpheum Society produced became the epitome
of jargon comedy. Unlike many other singspiel groups, this ensemble was only
partly associated with an aspect of popular culture that many viewed in a neg-
ative light. Th
e Budapest Orpheum Society was also able to draw intellectuals
and people from the upper echelons of society into their audiences. With their
attractive performance lineup that was both extremely humorous and critical of
the times, the ensemble found its way into literary works and thus became a part
of collective memory.87 Karl Kraus, though he wasn’t entirely serious, even com-
pared the Budapest Orpheum Society with the Burgtheater.88 In any case, there
was no other theater company in Vienna at the turn of the twentieth century that
embodied Jewish entertainment like the Budapest Orpheum Society.
Th
eir most important and best-known work was probably Die Klabriaspartie
(Th
e game of Klaberjass). Antal Oroszi (Caprice) wrote the play in 1889 and
debuted it in Budapest in the same year. A year later, a somewhat altered version
of the play written by Adolf Bergmann appeared in Vienna (see chapter 3 for a
longer discussion).89 Die Klabriaspartie enjoyed thousands of performances. Th
e
play focuses on a card game that Jews named Prokop Janitschek, Simon Dalles,
and Jonas Ries, as well as the “Bohemian” Kiebitz Dowidl, play in a coff
eehouse.
Th
ere is also a character named Moritz, who is a waiter. Subtle punchlines and
humorous statements run through the entire piece, and there is no recognizable
course of action.90 Despite the lack of plot, the play addresses the question of
Jewishness like almost no other production of the time. It rejects all attempts to
defi
ne Jewishness in a comprehensible fashion, suggesting that Jewishness cannot
be described or measured empirically.91 Similar to the other Volkssänger pieces
that I have discussed here, the message of Die Klabriaspartie seems clear: there
are no predetermined criteria for determining Jewishness, because it can only be
negotiated contextually.
Distinguishing between Jewish and Non-Jewish groups
Th
us far, I have focused in this chapter on Volkssänger ensembles that were gen-
erally considered to be Jewish and are still viewed as such today. Th
is categori-
zation appears to be justifi ed in that the majority of these groups were made up
of Jewish members, when we consider their ethnic, cultural, and religious affi
li-
ation. In addition, they performed pieces that often speak to a Jewish milieu or
articulate a Jewish theme. Because these “Jewish” groups often hired and rehired
the same actors and performers, they may well have made up an entire Jewish
Volkssänger milieu. Examples of actors who performed with various Jewish groups
are Karl Noisser and Mi zzi Symer. While Noisser worked for the Hirsch Society,
the Kassina Ensemble, and the Lemberg Singspiel Society, Symer performed with
the Hirsch Society, the Karl Kassina Ensemble, the S. Fischer Society, as well as
the Folies Caprice. To cite additional examples, Karl and Anna Kassina were
This open access edition has been made available under a CC BY 4.0 license thanks to the support of Knowledge Unlatched.
Entangled Entertainers
Jews and Popular Culture in Fin-de-Siècle Vienna
- Titel
- Entangled Entertainers
- Untertitel
- Jews and Popular Culture in Fin-de-Siècle Vienna
- Autor
- Klaus Hödl
- Verlag
- Berghahn Books
- Datum
- 2019
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-1-78920-031-7
- Abmessungen
- 14.86 x 23.2 cm
- Seiten
- 196
- Kategorien
- Geschichte Vor 1918
- International
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Introduction 1
- 1. Jews in Viennese Popular Culture around 1900 as Research Topic 13
- 2. Jewish Volkssänger and Musical Performers in Vienna around 1900 44
- 3. Jewishness and the Viennese Volkssänger 78
- 4. Jewish Spaces of Retreat at the Turn of the Twentieth Century 121
- 5. From Difference to Similarity 148
- Conclusion 163
- Bibliography 166
- Index 179