Seite - 18 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Bild der Seite - 18 -
Text der Seite - 18 -
18
smoothing procedure to get rid of high frequency noise variation.
The subtraction of deterministic time trends, first order differencing,
the Hodrick-Prescott filter, the Christiano-Fitzgerald filter and some
ad-hoc moving averages belong to this class. In most cases, sev-
eral steps have to be combined in order to single out the business
cycle.
Model-based approaches estimate all or some components by
assuming some specific structure for them. Further model-based
approaches concentrate on time series models. As they do not as-
sume a specific structure, they can also be regarded as filter
techniques. This goes for instance for the Beveridge-Nelson de-
composition where the economic time series is represented as a
time series model which is factorised after identification in order to
extract the business cycle.
3.2.1 Outliers
A proper identification of the business cycle requires a consistent
data base, adjusted for disturbances caused by outliers. This goes
for all approaches, whether they are model- or filter-based, direct
or indirect methods. According to the decomposition possibilities
outlined above, these outliers are contained in most cases in the
error term et of ( 1
) , together with other high frequency noise.
For an initial cleaning of the underlying time series, three different
types of outliers had been considered:
• additive outliers
• level shifts
• transitory components.
Additive outliers appear at one point in time and vanish thereafter
without having any lasting effect on the further development of
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177