Seite - 132 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Bild der Seite - 132 -
Text der Seite - 132 -
132
9
.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin
- Lippi - Reichlin (2000)
The study by Forni et al. (2000) is similar to the present one in that
both use a dynamic factor model approach in order to identify
the business cycle. The authors use a panel of 10 euro area coun-
tries, each represented by 21 macro-economic series like GDP, in-
vestment, consumption, unemployment, share prices, various
monetary aggregates and price indicators, starting in 1986 and
ending in 1999. Out of this data set they extracted three common
factors in order to explain at least 50 percent of the total variance
of the data set. As all financial and monetary variables contrib-
uted only very little to the explanation of total variance, the au-
thors excluded them as a first step from their further analysis. They
found that the common component is strongly reflected by GDP,
labour market variables and incoming orders of euro area core
countries (including Austria).
Forni et al. (2000) found that German GDP is not leading the euro
area business cycle, represented by the common component in-
cluded in euro area GDP. This result is quite in line with our findings.
Apart from the just HP-filtered series in our study, this result is robust
across all filtering methods and approaches to identify the cycle
according the highest cross-correlation criteria, as can be seen in
Tables A 1 a to c and Tables A 7 a to c.
As the authors use a very large data set, they added a lot of vari-
ance to the data set. Therefore it is clear that the common com-
ponent included in the Austrian GDP explains not as much
(44 percent) of the total variance of the data set as in our study
(83 percent). According to their study, Austria is less influenced by
the euro area business cycle than most other countries (like
France, Germany, Belgium, Finland, Spain and Italy) but more than
the Netherlands. Probably, this can be explained by stronger eco-
nomic policy reactions in Austria in the past. Nevertheless, the Aus-
trian business cycle is found to be coincident with the euro area
cycle, like with most of the core countries.
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Titel
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Autor
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Verlag
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Ort
- Frankfurt
- Datum
- 2008
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Abmessungen
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Seiten
- 236
- Schlagwörter
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Kategorien
- International
- Recht und Politik
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177