Page - 89 - in Cyborg Mind - What Brain–Computer and Mind–Cyberspace Interfaces Mean for Cyberneuroethics

Neuronal Interface Systems • 89 59. Ibid. 60. Synofzik and Schlaepfer, ‘Electrodes in the Brain’; Schlaepfer, Lisanby and Pallanti, ‘Separating Hope from Hype’. 61. Pacholczyk, ‘DBS Makes You Feel Good!’; Blank, Intervention in the Brain, 211. 62. Rathenau Instituut, From Bio to NBIC Convergence, 20. 63. Freeman, ‘Brain Control’. 64. Rees, ‘Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation’, 39–40. 65. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Novel Neurotechnologies, 10. 66. Geddes, ‘Brain Stimulation in Children Spurs Hope  – and Concern’. 67. Walsh and Cowey, ‘Magnetic Stimulation Studies of Visual Cognition’; Walsh and Pascual-Leone, Neurochronometrics of Mind and Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Novel Neurotechnologies, 16. 68. Geddes, ‘Brain Stimulation in Children Spurs Hope  – and Concern’. 69. Rees, ‘Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation’, 39–40. 70. Braude. 2016. ‘Enhancing Cognition in the “Brain Nation”’, 134; Horvath et al., ‘Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation’. 71. Luber and Lisanby, ‘Enhancement of Human Cognitive Performance’; Hamilton, Messing and Chatterjee, ‘Rethinking the Thinking Cap’. 72. British Medical Association, Boosting Your Brainpower, 12. 73. Barker, Jalinous and Freeston, ‘Non-invasive Magnetic Stimulation of Human Motor Cortex’. 74. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Novel Neurotechnologies, 17. 75. Maslen, ‘Toward an Ethical Framework for Regulating the Market for Cognitive Enhancement Devices’, 275. 76. Fox, ‘Neuroscience’; Blank, Intervention in the Brain, 31. 77. Choe et al., ‘Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Neuronal Activity and Learning in Pilot Training’. 78. Fregnia et al., ‘Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation’. 79. Boggiob et al., ‘Prefrontal Cortex Modulation Using Transcranial DC Stimulation’. 80. Geddes, ‘Brain Stimulation in Children Spurs Hope  – and Concern’. 81. One of the first times that it was suggested that mere thought could control a device in such a way was made by Jacques Vidal in 1973 in an article entitled ‘Towards Direct Brain–Computer Communication’. 82. Tracey, ‘Neural Interfaces and Brain Interference’. 83. Clerc, Bougrain and Lotte, ‘Introduction’, xviii–xix; Fairclough, ‘A Closed-Loop Perspective on Symbiotic Human–Computer Interaction’. 84. Jones, ‘Brain Chips’, 15–20. 85. The BrainGate™ Co., ‘BrainGate Neural Interface System’. Retrieved 13 October 2018 from http://www.braingate.com. 86. Llinás et al., ‘Neuro-vascular Central Nervous Recording/Stimulating System’. 87. Jones, ‘Brain Chips’, 15–20. 88. Fromhertz, ‘Electrical Interfacing of Nerve Cells and Semiconductor Chips’. 89. Jones, ‘Brain Chips’, 15–20. 90. Liu et al., ‘Syringe-Injectable Electronics’. 91. Banks, Look to Windward. 92. Rees, ‘The Scope and Limits of Neuroimaging’, 7–13. 93. Ibid. 94. U.S. Technology-Related Assistance of Individuals with Disability Act of 1988, quoted in R. Rupp et al., ‘Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technology’, 7–8. This open access edition has been made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license thanks to the support of Knowledge Unlatched. Not for resale.