Page - 227 - in Cyborg Mind - What Brain–Computer and Mind–Cyberspace Interfaces Mean for Cyberneuroethics

Neuronal Interfaces and Policy • 227 33. Blank, ‘Regulating Cognitive Enhancement Technologies’, 247–48. 34. Blank, Intervention in the Brain, 79–80. 35. Secretariat of the EGE, The Ethical Aspects of ICT Implants in the Human Body, 13. 36. Ibid. 37. Chan and Harris, ‘Neuroethics’, 84–85. 38. Blank, Intervention in the Brain, 79–80. 39. Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, The Revision of European Legislation on Medical Devices, 10, quoted in Maslen, ‘Toward an Ethical Framework’, 286. Bibliography Banerji, R. 2012. ‘David Hemler: 28 Years on the Run’, BBC News, 3 September. Retrieved 21 October 2018 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19331209. Blank, R.H. 2013. Intervention in the Brain: Politics, Policy, and Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ——. 2016. ‘Regulating Cognitive Enhancement Technologies’, in F. Jotterand and V.  Dublević (eds), Cognitive Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Braude, H. 2016. ‘Enhancing Cognition in the “Brain Nation”’, in F. Jotterand and V.  Dublević (eds), Cognitive Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bublitz, J.-C. 2013. ‘My Mind is Mine!? Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept’, in E. Hildt and A.G. Franke (eds), Cognitive Enhancement: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer. Chan, S., and J. Harris. 2011. ‘Neuroethics’, in Royal Society, Brain Waves Module 1: Neuroscience, Society and Policy. London: The Royal Society. DeVoe, R. 2018. ‘Transhumanism and Crypto: Interview with Zoltan Istvan’, Transhumanist, 15 July. Retrieved 20 October 2018 from https://bitsonline.com/zoltan-istvan-transhu- manism-crypto. European Parliament, Science and Technology Options Assessment. 2009. Human Enhancement Study. Brussels: European Parliament. (IP/A/STOA/FWC/2005-28/SC35, 41 and 45), IPOL/A/STOA/2007-13; PE 417.483. Government Office for Science, Foresight. 2013. Future Identities  – Changing Identities in the UK: The Next 10 Years. London: The Government Office for Science. Halder, D., and K. Jaishankar. 2011. Cyber Crime and the Victimization of Women: Laws, Rights, and Regulations. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Harvey, P. 2013. Can Histories of Previous Technological Breakthroughs, Drawn from the 20th and 21st Centuries and Including Recent Technologies, Tell Us Anything about How Identities Might Change over the Next 10 years, and Why? London: Government Office for Science. Heim, M. 1993. The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hook, C.C. 2002. ‘Cybernetics and Nanotechnology’, in J.F. Kilner, C.C. Hook and D.B. Uustal (eds), Cutting-Edge Bioethics: A Christian Exploration of Technologies and Trends. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. Ienca, M., and R. Andorno. 2017. ‘Towards New Human Rights in the Age of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology’, Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13(5), 1–27. Ienca, M., and P. Haselager. 2016. ‘Hacking the Brain: Brain–Computer Interfacing Technology and the Ethics of Neurosecurity’, Ethics and Information Technology 18(2), 117–29. This open access edition has been made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license thanks to the support of Knowledge Unlatched. Not for resale.