Seite - 37 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Bild der Seite - 37 -
Text der Seite - 37 -
37
usual assumption of orthogonality of trend and cycle. But it does
not necessarily represent a deficiency, as it seems plausible some-
times to see both components influenced by one shock. Admit-
tedly, this means - as criticised by Blanchard - Quah (1989} -
lumping together supply side shocks, which affect the secular
component, and demand-related shocks influencing the cycle.
As the Beveridge-Nelson approach is based on ARIMA time series
models, all problems linked to that sort of modelling are carried
over to this trend-cycle separation approach. Foremost, applying
this kind of modelling the problem is usually not to find a suitable
model but to discriminate between the large amounts of feasible
ones61 • The identification of the cycle therefore remains a some-
what arbitrary task and may be challenged in academic discus-
sions. Furthermore, ARIMA models became prominent on account
of their good short-run forecasting properties, whereas they per-
form quite poorly for longer-term projections. As a consequence,
one can extract quite different trends and cyclical components
from a plethora of suitable models.
3.2.4.8 Unobserved components models
This type of approach intends to model all components explicitly.
A special time series structure is modelled for the trend, the cycle,
some regression effects like working days, (possibly the season)
and even innovations like structural breaks or suspected outliers62•
This method is thus very flexible and a wide variety of specifica-
tions is possible. Usually the trend is modelled as some kind of ran-
dom walk process, possibly allowing for a drift. A prominent repre-
sentative of this approach is Harvey (1989}, who proposed a so-
61 Christiano - Eichenbaum ( 1992) mentioned this problem for practical business
cycle analysis.
62 For instance, CaNa/ho - HaNey (2004) estimated a model for the euro area with
a trend evolving stochastically in its slope and level with adding a serially corre-
lated stationary component representing the cycle.
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Titel
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Autor
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Verlag
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Ort
- Frankfurt
- Datum
- 2008
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Abmessungen
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Seiten
- 236
- Schlagwörter
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Kategorien
- International
- Recht und Politik
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177