Seite - 47 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Bild der Seite - 47 -
Text der Seite - 47 -
47
A different method of estimating factor models is the principal
component approach. It was originally developed in order to re-
duce the variance of large data sets by singling out a common
component that is capable of representing the largest part of the
total variation, by constructing simple linear combinations of it.
Each individual time series is represented by one or more common
components and some idiosyncratic variation. In the static case,
the idiosyncratic parts of all observed time series are either as-
sumed to be mutually uncorrelated (this is called the "strict factor
model") or they are allowed to be weakly cross-correlated and
heteroskedastic ("approximate factor models")71• A proper identifi-
cation of the common factors with relaxed assumptions - as it is
done in the approximate factor model - requires that the number
of time series considered exceeds the time dimension by far and
theoretically goes to infinity. This allows for the existence of idio-
syncratic common movements between business sectors, as long
as they are not too dominant. In the latter case they would enter
into the common component.
The dynamic version of this type of factor model approach seems
to be ideal for business cycle analysis. It allows the common fac-
tors to move auto-regressively and the observed time series can
be classified as leading, lagging or coincident according to the
common component represented by them. Again, some weak
cross-correlation between the idiosyncratic components is al-
lowed and the factors are required to be uncorrelated among
each other. Forni et al. (2000) suggested a generalised dynamic
factor model where the dynamic factors are identified in the fre-
quency domain. Instead of observing the cross-correlation matrix
in order to identify the dynamic factors, they focus is on the spec-
tral density matrix.
71 In the approximate factor model case, a weak correlation is allowed even be-
tween the factors and the idiosyncratic components. See Breitung - Eickmeier
(2005).
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Titel
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Autor
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Verlag
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Ort
- Frankfurt
- Datum
- 2008
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Abmessungen
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Seiten
- 236
- Schlagwörter
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Kategorien
- International
- Recht und Politik
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177