Seite - 81 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Bild der Seite - 81 -
Text der Seite - 81 -
81
of business cycle studies where the most recent time margin is not
in the focus of interest. They directly pay attention to the frequen-
cies which are regarded as the business cycle in the sense of Burns
- Mitchell ( 1946). Applying a band-pass filter, a researcher explic-
itly determines what he or she regards as the business cycle. For
the present study, a frequency window ranging from 6 to 32 quar-
ters is regarded as containing the business cycle. All cycles shorter
than l ½ years and longer than 8 years are filtered out. Compared
with the HP filter, the resulting time series carries less noise (due to
the leakage problem discussed earlier, there still remains a small
amount of high-frequency variation depending on the size of the
filter) and also the problem of extracting spurious cycles - as put
forward by Aaland (2005) - is reduced. Furthermore, as this filter is
symmetric, no phase shift is introduced, but the end-of-sample
problem remains. As the aim of this study is not to date the cycle in
real time, but to present a robust dating of past cycles, 6 quarters
at each end of the series are sacrificed in order to make the filter
work very exactly and thereby to reduce the leakage problem.
The band-pass filter proposed by Cristiano -Fitzgerald (2003) is not
considered in this study. While this filter serves as a good alterna-
tive to the Baxter-King filter close to either end of the series, it will
hardly offer an improvement within the series, and the weighting
scheme is more transparent in the case of the Baxter-King filter.
The Beveridge-Nelson decomposition has not been applied, due
to its theoretical shortcomings. All shocks influence the trend and
the cycle at the same time, which does not seem to be a plausi-
ble concept for the largest part of shocks. Furthermore, this
method has low power in discriminating between different mod-
els; therefore this lack of robustness makes it a poor guide to
check the robustness across different methods. Despite the fact
that unobserved-components models of a specific structure show
some interesting features, they are not considered here either.
Again, the large number of possibilities to model the different
economic time series components, allow no clear-cut statement
about this approach in comparison with others. Results of this
method depend more on the capabilities and personal judge-
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Titel
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Autor
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Verlag
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Ort
- Frankfurt
- Datum
- 2008
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Abmessungen
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Seiten
- 236
- Schlagwörter
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Kategorien
- International
- Recht und Politik
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177