Seite - 166 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Bild der Seite - 166 -
Text der Seite - 166 -
166
Boschan routine, as compared with just filtered series. This is quite
in line with theory, as the dynamic factor model is used for clean-
ing idiosyncratic cycles. Only in the case of first-order-differenced
series, the number of cycles detected increases. This can be ex-
plained by the fact that the large number of ups and downs of just
first-order-filtered time series is reduced by the dynamic factor
model by idiosyncratic ones. This reduction led to a lower number
of local minima and maxima, making it easier for the Bry-Boschan
routine to locate them.
Therefore, the BK-filter approach seems to be for theoretical as
well as for practical reasons, the superior preparation for dating a
cycle. Comparing the dating calendars for the Austrian business
cycle of just BK-filtered series with the ones represented by their
common component, one can observe that the number of cycles
is lower in the latter case. A short- lived cycle reflected in just fil-
tered Austrian gross value added (without agriculture and forestry)
starting with a trough in 3Q 1983 and a following peak one year
later has been recognised as of idiosyncratic nature and was
therefore filtered out. The absence of this cycle for that period is
confirmed by all studies compared with in chapter 9. They neither
show this cycle for the euro area nor for Austria 130•
There is only one further significant difference between just BK-
filtered series and the ones transformed by the dynamic factor
model, namely a trough following the peak around the change of
the year 1994-1995. Whereas this is dated in the first case in the
second quarter of 1997, it is located in the first quarter of 1999 by
the common component approach. To check this again, results
are compared with other studies. Unfortunately, only one of the
studies presented in chapter 9 can be compared for this time
span. Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) confirm both troughs and
130 Only three studies provide a comparable dating calendar: Artis - Krolzig - Toro
(2004), Hahn -Walterskirchen (1992) and the dating calendar for the euro area by
the CEPR.
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Titel
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Autor
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Verlag
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Ort
- Frankfurt
- Datum
- 2008
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Abmessungen
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Seiten
- 236
- Schlagwörter
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Kategorien
- International
- Recht und Politik
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177