Seite - 89 - in Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court - The Antique as Innovation, Band 1
Bild der Seite - 89 -
Text der Seite - 89 -
89Travel—Wenzel
Jamnitzer
part of his more general artistic training, and his interest in coins and medals
was the principal motive for his doing so. But he had never obtained any for-
mal qualification in the craft, nor exercised it himself in any commercial way.
Nevertheless Strada rented or even owned a house which was spacious
enough to house a goldsmith’s workshop, and he had acquired sufficient ex-
perience and name to obtain—and sufficient financial security to be able to
accept—a very grand commission from a most illustrious patron. Though em-
ploying one or more collaborators, Strada thought he would need a year to
complete the work planned.47 This may have been a splendid liturgical object
intended for Marignano’s brother, Cardinal de’ Medici, such as a set of liturgi-
cal vessels, a set of candelabra or a reliquary, but it is more likely that it was a
secular object intended to increase Marignano’s personal prestige. One thinks
of a table-centrepiece or—fountain, or a sumptuous Credenz similar to, for
instance, Wenzel Jamnitzer’s Merkelsche Tafelaufsatz now in the Rijksmuseum
in Amsterdam [Fig. 2.10–2.11]. Purchased from the artist in 1549 by the Nurem-
berg Council, this grandest of Jamnitzer’s early works appears to have been
intended as a diplomatic gift to Charles v.48
Several reasons can be suggested why the Council was prepared to relax
its rules in favour of Strada’s project. Marignano’s rank, his connection with
the Imperial court, possibly even a formal request from Charles v on behalf
of his general, would have sufficed to obtain something akin to Zunftfreiheit
for the artists he employed.49 Moreover, the opportunity to secure such an ex-
ceptional commission for Nuremberg craftsmen—Strada planned to employ a
local master or journeyman for about a year in this one project—warranted an
occasional exception to the rules. Yet the jealous care with which the Council
guarded both the correct alloy of the material and the standard of craftsman-
ship of the products that left the Nuremberg workshops, suggest that it would
47 Doc. 1547-03-12. Strada would take some financial risk in engaging other goldsmiths, less
in the purchase of the raw material, which for a commission on this scale was probably
provided by the patron himself.
48 The Merkelsche Tafelaufsatz was acquired by the Nuremberg Council in 1549 from the
artist himself for the sum of 1228 Gulden and 10 Schillinge. Jamnitzer’s beautiful, coloured
design (‘Visierung’) has been preserved, as has a wooden model of the supporting figure
of the Earth, and the splendid morocco case (‘Futteral’). Though probably intended as a
gift to Charles v, it remained in the possession of the town. It is tempting to suppose that
it is identical with Marignano’s commission, which the Marquis may have failed to actu-
ally pay for. See: Pechstein 1974; Wenzel Jamnitzer 1985, cat. nr. 15, pp. 219–221; nr. 299, pp.
342–343 and nr. 502, pp. 406–408.
49 On the liberty of guild’s restrictions accorded to official court-artists and purveyors to
court, see Warnke 1985, pp. 85–96.
zurück zum
Buch Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court - The Antique as Innovation, Band 1"
Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court
The Antique as Innovation, Band 1
- Titel
- Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court
- Untertitel
- The Antique as Innovation
- Band
- 1
- Autor
- Dirk Jacob Jansen
- Verlag
- Brill
- Ort
- Leiden
- Datum
- 2019
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-90-04-35949-9
- Abmessungen
- 15.8 x 24.1 cm
- Seiten
- 572
- Kategorien
- Biographien
- Kunst und Kultur
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Preface XV
- Acknowledgements XVIII
- Acknowledgments of Financial Support Received XXI
- List of Abbreviations XXII
- Introduction: The Image—Or from Whom (Not?) to Buy a Second-Hand Car 1
- 0.1 The Portraits of Jacopo and Ottavio Strada 1
- 0.2 Why are These Portraits so Special? 4
- 0.3 Motions of the Mind 4
- 0.4 What is Known About Strada: Early Notices 9
- 0.5 Quellenkunde: Some Sources Published in the NineteenthCentury 15
- 0.6 Kulturgeschichte before World War II 19
- 0.7 Romance: Josef Svátek and the Rudolfine Legend 21
- 0.8 A (Very) Modest Place in the History of Classical Scholarship 24
- 0.9 Contemporary Scholarship 25
- 0.10 What Has Not Been Written on Jacopo Strada 37
- 0.11 Weaving the Strands Together: The Purpose of this Study 39
- 1 Early Years: Family Background, Education, Giulio Romano 45
- 2 Travel: Rome, Landshut, Nuremberg—Strada’s Connection withWenzel Jamnitzer 67
- 3 In Hans Jakob Fuggers’s Service 107
- 3.1 Hans Jakob Fugger 107
- 3.2 Fugger as a Patron and Collector 114
- 3.3 Fugger’s Employment of Strada 121
- 3.4 Architectural Patronage for the Fuggers: The DonauwörthStudiolo 134
- 3.5 Strada’s Trips to Lyon 137
- 3.6 Strada’s Contacts in Lyon: Sebastiano Serlio 149
- 3.7 Civis Romanus: Strada’s Sojourn in Rome 156
- 3.8 Commissions and Purchases: The Genesis of Strada’s Musaeum 174
- 3.9 Departure from Rome 183
- 4 Antiquario Della Sacra Cesarea Maesta: Strada’s Tasksat Court 188
- 4.1 Looking for Patronage: Strada’s Arrival at the ImperialCourt 188
- 4.2 The Controversy with Wolfgang Lazius 200
- 4.3 ‘Obwol Ir.Maj. den Strada selbst dier Zeit wol zu geprauchen’: Strada’s Tasks at Court 210
- 4.4 Indirect Sources Throwing Light on Strada’s Employment at Court 242
- 4.5 Conclusion 248
- 5 Jacopo Strada as an Imperial Architect: Background 251
- 5.1 Introduction: The Austrian Habsburgs as Patrons of Architecture 251
- 5.2 The Prince as Architect: Ferdinand I and Maximilian II asAmateurs and Patrons of Architecture 255
- 5.3 ‘Adeste Musae’: Maximilian’s Hunting Lodge and Garden in the Prater 290
- 5.4 The Imperial Residence: Status quo at Strada’s Arrival 307
- 5.5 The Architectural Infrastructure at the Imperial Court 319
- 5.6 Strada’s Competence as an Architect 331
- 6 Strada’s Role in Projects Initiated by Emperor Ferdinand I 339
- 7 An Object Lesson: Strada’s House in Vienna 367
- 8 The Munich Antiquarium 383
- 9 The Neugebäude 430
- 9.1 The Tomb of Ferdinand I and Anna in Prague; Licinio’s Paintings in Pressburg 431
- 9.2 Kaiserebersdorf and Katterburg 432
- 9.3 Sobriety versus Conspicuous Consumption 437
- 9.4 Hans Jakob Fugger’s Letter 438
- 9.5 Description of the Complex 441
- 9.6 The Personal Involvement of Emperor Maximilian II 455
- 9.7 Ottoman Influence? 463
- 9.8 Classical Sources: Roman Castrametatio and the Fortified Palace of Diocletian at Split 467
- 9.9 Classical Sources: Monuments of Ancient Rome 480
- 9.10 Contemporary Italian Architecture 489
- 9.11 Strada’s Contribution 500
- 9.12 Conclusion: Strada’s Role in the Design of the Neugebäude 507
- 10 Other Patrons of Architecture 514
- 10.1 The Courtyard of the Landhaus in Graz 514
- 10.2 The Residence for Archduke Ernest 517
- 10.3 Other Patrons: Vilém z Rožmberk 520
- 10.4 Jan Šembera Černohorský z Boskovic and BučoviceCastle 524
- 10.5 Christoph von Teuffenbach: The House in Vienna and the Castle at Drnholec 530
- 10.6 Reichard Strein von Schwarzenau and the Castle at Schwarzenau 534
- 10.7 Conclusion 542