Seite - 96 - in Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court - The Antique as Innovation, Band 1
Bild der Seite - 96 -
Text der Seite - 96 -
Chapter
296
Archduke in person. This conception of his function as ‘sopradicapo’ closely
corresponds to the task he had undertaken when he accepted the commission
of the Marquis of Marignano, as sketched above, though now he would not be
responsible to acquire the materials and would leave the actual execution of
the piece to Jamnitzer and his helpmates.61
The young Archduke accepted Strada’s offer by return of post, requesting
him to come to Prague and to take with him all materials that might be useful,
and Strada immediately set out. But though the vicissitudes of the project—
which for lack of silver never seems to have been realized in its entirety—can
be followed in the Archduke’s correspondence with Jamnitzer for several years,
we find no further reference to Strada. We know that by March 1559 several
‘Visierungen’, designs, had been proposed, none of which had been found en-
tirely satisfactory, but we do not know whether Strada had a hand in their
conception—or in their rejection. Possibly Strada was not able to continue the
general supervision of the project as a whole after he received his appointment
as a court architect to the Archduke’s father, the Emperor Ferdinand i, in the
spring of 1558.62 Yet it is rather more likely that, being present at the Impe-
rial court, he remained involved in the continuation of the project—parts of
which appear to have been executed at court—and was at least occasionally
consulted by the Archduke.63
2.5.4 The ‘schöner Brunnen’ Commissioned by Maximilian ii
Strada’s planned collaboration with Jamnitzer on this project has been one
of the arguments advanced to support the assumption of Strada’s participa-
tion in a project commissioned a decade later from Jamnitzer by the Arch-
duke’s elder brother, King Maximilian, who had by that time acceded to the
Imperial throne. This extremely ambitious object, nowadays referred to as the
‘schöner Brunnen’ or ‘Prager Brunnen’, was commissioned in 1568, but was only
61 It seems surprising that Jamnitzer, of whom several splendid designs (Visierungen) for
works executed by him (including the Merkelsche Tafelaufsatz) have been preserved,
should wish to work after drawings provided by others. On the other hand it may well
be that for this important commission he liked to have some erudite assistance. Strada’s
artistic experience and worldly wisdom made him suitable for that task, and Jamnitzer
must have known him sufficiently well to know what to expect of him. I think it most
probable that the two planned to discuss the technical and artistic aspects of any sketches
and designs in detail, before submitting them to the Archduke.
62 See Jamnitzer’s letter to Archduke Ferdinand, Nürnberg 27 March 1557, quoted in Schön-
herr 1888, p. 296; for Strada’s appointment at the Imperial court, see below, Ch. 4.
63 Schönherr 1888.
zurück zum
Buch Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court - The Antique as Innovation, Band 1"
Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court
The Antique as Innovation, Band 1
- Titel
- Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court
- Untertitel
- The Antique as Innovation
- Band
- 1
- Autor
- Dirk Jacob Jansen
- Verlag
- Brill
- Ort
- Leiden
- Datum
- 2019
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-90-04-35949-9
- Abmessungen
- 15.8 x 24.1 cm
- Seiten
- 572
- Kategorien
- Biographien
- Kunst und Kultur
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Preface XV
- Acknowledgements XVIII
- Acknowledgments of Financial Support Received XXI
- List of Abbreviations XXII
- Introduction: The Image—Or from Whom (Not?) to Buy a Second-Hand Car 1
- 0.1 The Portraits of Jacopo and Ottavio Strada 1
- 0.2 Why are These Portraits so Special? 4
- 0.3 Motions of the Mind 4
- 0.4 What is Known About Strada: Early Notices 9
- 0.5 Quellenkunde: Some Sources Published in the NineteenthCentury 15
- 0.6 Kulturgeschichte before World War II 19
- 0.7 Romance: Josef Svátek and the Rudolfine Legend 21
- 0.8 A (Very) Modest Place in the History of Classical Scholarship 24
- 0.9 Contemporary Scholarship 25
- 0.10 What Has Not Been Written on Jacopo Strada 37
- 0.11 Weaving the Strands Together: The Purpose of this Study 39
- 1 Early Years: Family Background, Education, Giulio Romano 45
- 2 Travel: Rome, Landshut, Nuremberg—Strada’s Connection withWenzel Jamnitzer 67
- 3 In Hans Jakob Fuggers’s Service 107
- 3.1 Hans Jakob Fugger 107
- 3.2 Fugger as a Patron and Collector 114
- 3.3 Fugger’s Employment of Strada 121
- 3.4 Architectural Patronage for the Fuggers: The DonauwörthStudiolo 134
- 3.5 Strada’s Trips to Lyon 137
- 3.6 Strada’s Contacts in Lyon: Sebastiano Serlio 149
- 3.7 Civis Romanus: Strada’s Sojourn in Rome 156
- 3.8 Commissions and Purchases: The Genesis of Strada’s Musaeum 174
- 3.9 Departure from Rome 183
- 4 Antiquario Della Sacra Cesarea Maesta: Strada’s Tasksat Court 188
- 4.1 Looking for Patronage: Strada’s Arrival at the ImperialCourt 188
- 4.2 The Controversy with Wolfgang Lazius 200
- 4.3 ‘Obwol Ir.Maj. den Strada selbst dier Zeit wol zu geprauchen’: Strada’s Tasks at Court 210
- 4.4 Indirect Sources Throwing Light on Strada’s Employment at Court 242
- 4.5 Conclusion 248
- 5 Jacopo Strada as an Imperial Architect: Background 251
- 5.1 Introduction: The Austrian Habsburgs as Patrons of Architecture 251
- 5.2 The Prince as Architect: Ferdinand I and Maximilian II asAmateurs and Patrons of Architecture 255
- 5.3 ‘Adeste Musae’: Maximilian’s Hunting Lodge and Garden in the Prater 290
- 5.4 The Imperial Residence: Status quo at Strada’s Arrival 307
- 5.5 The Architectural Infrastructure at the Imperial Court 319
- 5.6 Strada’s Competence as an Architect 331
- 6 Strada’s Role in Projects Initiated by Emperor Ferdinand I 339
- 7 An Object Lesson: Strada’s House in Vienna 367
- 8 The Munich Antiquarium 383
- 9 The Neugebäude 430
- 9.1 The Tomb of Ferdinand I and Anna in Prague; Licinio’s Paintings in Pressburg 431
- 9.2 Kaiserebersdorf and Katterburg 432
- 9.3 Sobriety versus Conspicuous Consumption 437
- 9.4 Hans Jakob Fugger’s Letter 438
- 9.5 Description of the Complex 441
- 9.6 The Personal Involvement of Emperor Maximilian II 455
- 9.7 Ottoman Influence? 463
- 9.8 Classical Sources: Roman Castrametatio and the Fortified Palace of Diocletian at Split 467
- 9.9 Classical Sources: Monuments of Ancient Rome 480
- 9.10 Contemporary Italian Architecture 489
- 9.11 Strada’s Contribution 500
- 9.12 Conclusion: Strada’s Role in the Design of the Neugebäude 507
- 10 Other Patrons of Architecture 514
- 10.1 The Courtyard of the Landhaus in Graz 514
- 10.2 The Residence for Archduke Ernest 517
- 10.3 Other Patrons: Vilém z Rožmberk 520
- 10.4 Jan Šembera Černohorský z Boskovic and BučoviceCastle 524
- 10.5 Christoph von Teuffenbach: The House in Vienna and the Castle at Drnholec 530
- 10.6 Reichard Strein von Schwarzenau and the Castle at Schwarzenau 534
- 10.7 Conclusion 542