Page - 115 - in The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
Image of the Page - 115 -
Text of the Page - 115 -
5. All changes depend on the first locomotion,
but not vice versa
5.1 Overview
Apart from some remarks about the different kinds of priority that I will
focus on later in this chapter, the third argument follows directly after the
second one and is presented in the following passage:
ὥστ᾽ ἐπεὶ κίνησιν μὲν ἀναγκαῖον εἶναι συνεχῶς, εἴη δ᾽ ἂν συνεχῶς
ἢ συνεχὴς οὖσα ἢ ἐφεξῆς, μᾶλλον δ᾽ ἡ συνεχής, καὶ βέλτιον
συνεχῆ ἢ ἐφεξῆς εἶναι, τὸ δὲ βέλτιον ἀεὶ ὑπολαμβάνομεν ἐν τῇ
φύσει ὑπάρχειν, ἂν ᾖ δυνατόν, δυνατὸν δὲ συνεχῆ εἶναι
(δειχθήσεται δ᾽ ὕστερον· νῦν δὲ τοῦτο ὑποκείσθω), καὶ ταύτην
οὐδεμίαν ἄλλην οἷόν τε εἶναι ἀλλ᾽ ἢ φοράν, ἀνάγκη τὴν φορὰν
εἶναι πρώτην. οὐδεμία γὰρ ἀνάγκη οὔτε αὔξεσθαι οὔτε
ἀλλοιοῦσθαι τὸ φερόμενον, οὐδὲ δὴ γίγνεσθαι ἢ φθείρεσθαι· τού-
των δὲ οὐδεμίαν ἐνδέχεται τῆς συνεχοῦς μὴ οὔσης, ἣν κινεῖ τὸ
πρῶτον κινοῦν. (260b19–29)
Therefore, as change must exist continuously, and it would exist continu-
ously either by being continuous, or [by being] a succession of changes,
but in a fuller way the continuous one, that is, it is better to be continu-
ous than to be in succession, and we presuppose that the better is always
the case in nature, if it is possible, and [since] it is possible that it is con-
tinuous—this will be shown later, but let us just suppose it for now, and
that this can be no other [change] than locomotion—locomotion must
be primary. For neither is there necessity for that which undergoes loco-
motion to undergo growth, nor alteration, nor generation or corruption.
But of these [other changes], none may [be] if the continuous one is not,
which the first mover is causing.
The third argument basically shows that locomotion has ontological priority
over the other kinds of change, since only a change in place in principle
may be one, continuous, and eternal and thus is the only possible candidate
for being the one eternal change which is directly caused by the first
unmoved mover. This means that change in place in virtue of being this
only candidate is necessary for the occurrence of any of the other three
ISBN Print: 9783525253069 — ISBN E-Book: 9783647253060
© 2014, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen
The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Title
- The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Author
- Sebastian Odzuck
- Editor
- Dorothea Frede
- Gisela Striker
- Publisher
- Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co
- Date
- 2014
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9783647253060
- Size
- 15.5 x 23.2 cm
- Pages
- 238
- Categories
- Geisteswissenschaften
- Naturwissenschaften Physik
Table of contents
- Acknowledgements 9
- 1. Introduction 10
- 2. The importance of the primary kind of change 14
- 3. Change in quality and quantity of living beings depends on loco-motion, but not vice versa 42
- 4. Locomotion necessarily accompanies each of the other kinds of change, but not vice versa 71
- 4.1 Overview 71
- 4.2 What changes in quantity changes with respect to place 73
- 4.3 What undergoes generation or corruption changes with respect to place 89
- 4.4 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 98
- 4.4.1 Overview 98
- 4.4.2 What does it mean that condensation and rarefaction are principles of quality? 100
- 4.4.3 Every alteration involves a change in the four basic qualities 104
- 4.4.4 Every change in the four basic qualities involves con- densation or rarefaction 108
- 4.4.5 Condensation and rarefaction are forms of aggregation and segregation 110
- 4.4.6 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 112
- 4.4.7 Conclusion 113
- 4.5 Conclusion 113
- 5. All changes depend on the first locomotion, but not vice versa 115
- 6. Locomotion has temporal priority 144
- 6.1 Overview 144
- 6.2 Locomotion has priority in time, since it is the only change eternals can undergo 146
- 6.3 Objection: Locomotion is the last of all changes in perishable things 148
- 6.4 Coming to be presupposes an earlier locomotion 150
- 6.5 The locomotion of the sun as a cause of generation 154
- 6.6 Conclusion 162
- 7. Locomotion is prior in essence 164
- 7.1 Locomotion is prior in essence, since it is last in coming to be 164
- 7.2 Locomotion alone preserves its subject’s essence 186
- 7.2.1 Overview 186
- 7.2.2 Locomotion does not change its subject’s being 188
- 7.2.3 Locomotion preserves its subject’s essence best 190
- 7.2.4 Making x depart from its essence by being part of a change in essence? 195
- 7.2.5 Change in quality or quantity in principle may result in a change in essence 202
- 7.3 Conclusion: Locomotion’s priority in essence 207
- 8. Conclusion 211
- Bibliography 220
- List of Abbreviations 223
- Index Locorum 221
- Index Nominum 223
- Index Rerum 221