Page - 38 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Image of the Page - 38 -
Text of the Page - 38 -
38
called local linear trend where the level as well as the slope is rep-
resented by stochastic processes. Depending on restrictions of the
variance of these shocks, deterministic as well as random walks
(with or without drift) and smoothly evolving trends can result63. This
flexibility makes it difficult to judge the appropriateness of unob-
served components models for business cycle analysis. In some
more simple specifications they come close to the Beveridge-
Nelson decomposition method.
Morley - Nelson - Zivot (2002) argue that in the unobserved com-
ponents framework the common (but not necessary) restriction
that trend and cycle are uncorrelated leads to great differences
in the cyclical output. Whereas the Beveridge-Nelson decomposi-
tion implies that a stochastic trend accounts for most of the varia-
tion in output, the cyclical variation is dominant in unobserved
components models for their part. Lifting the restriction of trend
and cycle being uncorrelated, the two approaches can yield
identical decompositions. As Blanchard - Quah ( 1989) assigned
supply shocks to the trend and demand shocks to the cycle, the
assumption of uncorrelatedness in isolating the cycle can have
decisively different consequences for economic policy.
A possible advantage of modelling explicitly all components - as it
is done in the unobserved components approach - is that this
process can bear closer relation to economic theory than me-
chanical filtering procedures do. Whereas the purely statistical
non-parametric procedures of detrending can be accused of
practicing "measurement without theory", Canova ( 1998) accuses
all economic-theory-based decompositions as, "at best, attempts
to approximate unknown features of a series and therefore sub-
ject to specification errors". So, the explicit modelling strategy not
only allows capturing theoretical aspects, but also contains sev-
eral subjective assumptions.
63 Koopman et al. (2000) give an overview over how certain combinations of these
restrictions affect the trend.
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Title
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Author
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Publisher
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Location
- Frankfurt
- Date
- 2008
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Size
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Pages
- 236
- Keywords
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Categories
- International
- Recht und Politik
Table of contents
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177