Page - 96 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Image of the Page - 96 -
Text of the Page - 96 -
96
their coincident comovements, the different statistics informing
about leads and lags of the various time series do not. While the
mean delay would justify classifying autJK as lagging by one pe-
riod, the cross-correlation was highest for coincident data. GerGHI,
for its part, would be classified as lagging by one quarter accord-
ing to the frequency-domain-based method, whereas rmax is high-
est at a three-quarters lag in the time domain108• The largest differ-
ence between both approaches in the first-order-difference case
can be observed for the German financial, real estate, renting
and business services (gerJK). Whereas the mean delay indicates
a lead by one-fourth of a quarter (0.21), the cross-correlation sta-
tistics suggest a lag by one year ( ,max at minus four quarters).
For the HP-filtered data case, differences are not that large be-
tween the information about leads and lags given by cross-
correlations and mean delays. None of the latter exceeds one or
minus one quarter, and this is closely in line with the information
provided by cross-correlations. Only in the case of gerGHI and
ger JK, cross-correlations again suggests a lag of 3 or 4 quarters re-
spectively, compared with the reference series, whereas mean
delay statistics indicate only a small lag of approximately half a
quarter.
The picture is similar for BK-filtered data. The signs of the period shift
seem to be the same between the cross-correlation criteria and
the mean delay. Every time cross-correlation suggests a lag, this is
not contradicted by the mean. But the number of periods of leads
and lags indicated by cross-correlations are again much higher
than according to mean delays. The criterion of cross-correlation
seems less than reliable. As in the HP-and BK-filtering cases ,max for
ger JK is at a lag of four quarters, but the cross-correlation at 10 is
only marginally different from that.
108 Admittedly, the difference between the rm,. of 0.18 and r0 of 0.06 is quite small.
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Title
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Author
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Publisher
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Location
- Frankfurt
- Date
- 2008
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Size
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Pages
- 236
- Keywords
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Categories
- International
- Recht und Politik
Table of contents
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177