Page - 99 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Image of the Page - 99 -
Text of the Page - 99 -
99
Not only the proportion of the total variation of the data set ex-
plained by the common factors, but also the proportion reflected
in each time series is of interest. Table A 7 gives for all three filtering
methods the proportion of variation explained by the two com-
mon factors reflected by the respective time series. In the case of
first-order-differenced data (the FOO section of Table A 6), both
common factors are able to explain more than 70 percent of the
variance of the series autGV Aex, gerCDE and gerGVAex, which is
quite in line with theory. However, the variation of euro area GDP
excluding Austria and Germany is only explained to one-half
(48 percent) by both factors. In all cases (except in the case of the
Austrian financial intermediation, real estate and business service
sector), the explanatory power of the common component in-
creases by moving from the first-order-difference data to HP- and
BK-filtered ones, supporting the view that idiosyncratic cycles are
primarily a high-frequency phenomenon. This result can also be
obtained by looking at the average over all series given in the bot-
tom line or by forming averages over all frequencies up to the
second eigen value of Tab/es A 5 a to c. In the BK-filtered data
case, the common factors are capable of explaining nearly
70 percent of the variation of the euro area GDP series (
again ex-
cluding Austria and Germany). Furthermore, the value for the Aus-
trian industrial production has improved considerably to nearly
80 percent. The explanatory power of the two common factors is
especially strong for those series responding typically to business
cycle movements. This supports the view that the variance repre-
sented by the two common factors is close to something that can
be considered as the business cycle. Furthermore, the exception-
ally low values for some series like the construction industry in Aus-
tria and Germany and financial intermediation, real estate and
business activities are quite in line with theory which suggests that
these sectors have a low connection to the business cycle.
As the variation of the common factors represented in each of the
series can be regarded as cleaning them by their idiosyncratic
variations, the difference between looking at frequency-filtered
series alone and series transformed by our dynamic factor model
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Title
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Author
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Publisher
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Location
- Frankfurt
- Date
- 2008
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Size
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Pages
- 236
- Keywords
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Categories
- International
- Recht und Politik
Table of contents
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177