Page - 100 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Image of the Page - 100 -
Text of the Page - 100 -
100
can be regarded as sector- or country-specific idiosyncratic cycli-
cality. The series representing the common component can be
processed further in most cases like just filtered ones. Table A 7 a to
c show for different filtering techniques cross-correlations with the
reference series, both represented only by their common compo-
nent variability. Again, the Austrian gross value added (without
agriculture and forestry) serves as the reference series, but this
time it is cleaned for all its idiosyncratic variation.
In the first-order-difference case, it can be observed that the Aus-
trian construction industry - while exhibiting only a small part of
common variation according to Table A 6 - shows a strong co-
movement with the reference series. Furthermore, nearly all series
seem to be coincident with the reference cycle, which corre-
sponds to the picture we got from the analysis carried out with just
filtered series as given in Table A 1 a. Only two series are not found
to be coincident. The first is ger
JK (the German sector of financial
intermediation, real estate and business services) which shows a
lag of 4 quarters in the case of observing only the common com-
ponent. This lag was somewhat shorter for the just filtered series (2
quarters). The second is the German trade, restaurants and trans-
port and communication sector. Its common-component varia-
tion shows a leading behaviour of 2 quarters compared with the
reference cycle, whereas it has been classified as lagging by 4
quarters in the unprocessed case. All in all, for first-order-
differenced series, the common-components variations convey
nearly the same picture of leads and lags.
For HP-filtered data, Table A 7 b reveals that all series cleaned for
their idiosyncratic movements show coincident behaviour with re-
gard to the business cycle represented by the cleaned reference
series. For the uncleaned series, as shown in Table A 1 b, again the
same picture emerges, but differences can be observed for
gerGHI and ger
JK, with both series classified as lagging according
to their highest cross-correlations.
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Title
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Author
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Publisher
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Location
- Frankfurt
- Date
- 2008
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Size
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Pages
- 236
- Keywords
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Categories
- International
- Recht und Politik
Table of contents
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177