Page - 101 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Image of the Page - 101 -
Text of the Page - 101 -
101
While results based on just filtered series were quite different for BK-
filtered data as compared with the HP and the first-order-
difference filter, they now look more similar to each other. In the
present instance, nearly all series are classified as coincident ac-
cording to their highest cross-correlations with the reference series.
Only for the Austrian sector of financial intermediation, real estate
and business services, the highest cross-correlation is observed for
a lead of 4 quarters. This result is not confirmed in the case of un-
cleaned series. There. this sector has been classified as lagging like
the series gerGHI and ger JK.
Figure 9: Common component and BK-filtered GVAex of Austria
1•1976 3-1 978 1-1981 3-1983 1-1986 3-1988 1-1991 3-1993 1-1996 3-1998 1-2001 3-2003
Source: Own calculations.
All in all, quite a similar picture seems to emerge when looking at
leads or lags of series represented just by their common variation
and the uncleaned series. Only in the case of the series gerGHI
and ger
JK, idiosyncratic cycles seem to matter. This result is also
reflected in the case of BK-filtered data, which implies that this
idiosyncratic variability has a frequency that lies within the band of
business cycles (i.e. between 6 and 32 quarters). In that respect.
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Title
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Author
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Publisher
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Location
- Frankfurt
- Date
- 2008
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Size
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Pages
- 236
- Keywords
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Categories
- International
- Recht und Politik
Table of contents
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177