Page - 112 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Image of the Page - 112 -
Text of the Page - 112 -
112
Due to these difficulties, only results based on BK-filtered data are
analysed more closely in the following. The short leading property
of the euro area business cycle (excluding Germany and Austria)
for averages, as shown in Table A 3 c (for medians only coinci-
dence can be observed), is confirmed by cross-correlation and
mean delay according to Table A 1 c. Looking at euro area GDP
including both countries (which introduces a bias), both tables in-
dicate a shift towards a more coincident behaviour. A different
picture is presented for the German economy. Whereas Ta-
ble A 1 c suggests a coincident behaviour of the German business
cycle, represented by the series gerGVAex, with respect to the
Austrian cycle, the turning point analysis in Table A 3 c indicates
for averages and means a leading behaviour. In order to obtain a
clearer picture of the German business cycle properties, the be-
haviour of German GDP has been observed. But looking at this se-
ries, differences become even more pronounced. Cross-correla-
tion and mean delay statistics suggest a lag of German GDP with
respect to autGV Aex, while peaks and troughs are leading on av-
erage and for medians. Even the search for a possible change of
the pattern over time was not successful. According to Table A 2,
turning point dates for the first half of the series give no systemati-
cally different picture than for the second half. Therefore this ques-
tion remains unresolved for the case of an ad-hoc definition of the
business cycle.
The dates identified allow further the measuring of the length of
cycles and phases of all series. This can be done either by simply
dividing the total time span of the series of approximately 30 years
by the number of cycles. For the cyclical variations included in the
Austrian reference series autGVAex, this gives for seven cycles an
average length of around four years for one complete business
cycle. For a closer observation, Tables A 4 a to c show the aver-
age duration of cycles and phases, with cycles defined as the
time span between two successive turning points with the same
sign (two peaks or two troughs) and phases as the time span be-
tween different turning points (from peak to trough or trough to
peak). Thus, two successive phases give a complete cycle. In or-
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Title
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Author
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Publisher
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Location
- Frankfurt
- Date
- 2008
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Size
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Pages
- 236
- Keywords
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Categories
- International
- Recht und Politik
Table of contents
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177