Page - 127 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Image of the Page - 127 -
Text of the Page - 127 -
127
criterion of our study114• In our study too, the ad-hoc method as
well as the dynamic-factor-model approach show their highest
correlation at zero lag for the gerGVAex as well as for eurGDPex
when compared with the reference series (
autG V Aex). But if one
looks at our leading and lagging properties after dating the series
by the Bry-Boschan algorithm, the picture is not so clear. Only for
our band-pass-filtered series in the ad-hoc scenario, both the
German as well as the euro area business cycle show approxi-
mately the same lead (Table A 3 c) with respect to the Austrian
cycle. This leads to the conclusion that both series are coincident
with each other. In the dynamic factor model approach, the
same can be observed only for first-order-differenced data (Ta-
ble A 9 a), where both series show a lag vis-a-vis the reference se-
ries. For HP- and BK-filtered data, the euro area business cycle
leads the Austrian cycle, but is coincident with the German cycle
(Table A 8 band c).
For the euro area as a whole, Altissimo et al. (2001) found that in-
dustrial production is pro-cyclical with regard to the euro area
business cycle. This is in line with the results found here for the
manufacturing sector of Austria and Germany, represented by the
variables autCDE and gerCDE. The cross-correlations presented in
Tables A 1 a to c show - especially in the case of HP-filtered data -
a coincident behaviour to the reference series autGVAex, while
using just first-order-differences yields a lag and for BK-filtered data
some small lead. Also the phase and cycle lengths shown in Ta-
bles A 4 a to c suggest that for all three filtering methods there ex-
ists a very high degree of comovement with the reference series.
As Altissimo et al. (2001) used a method quite similar to the dy-
namic factor model approach in our study, it is more appropriate
to compare their results with our dynamic factor model outcome.
11• As German GDP is included in the euro area with its heavy weight, this finding
by Altissimo et al. (200 I) can be regarded as being somewhat biased towards a
coincident behaviour between Germany and the euro area.
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Title
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Author
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Publisher
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Location
- Frankfurt
- Date
- 2008
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Size
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Pages
- 236
- Keywords
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Categories
- International
- Recht und Politik
Table of contents
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177