Page - 141 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Image of the Page - 141 -
Text of the Page - 141 -
141
the sample into two parts, one covering the period from 1979 to
1986, the other from 1987 to 1996. For the whole sample, Vijselaar -
Albers (2001) found that euro area individual countries' manufac-
turing production shows a high synchronised comovement with
the euro area as a whole. With regard to the size of coincident
cross-correlations, Austria ranges third after France and the Neth-
erlands. In the first period, Austria ranges second after France.
The authors further examined whether time-shifting of the data
yields higher cross-correlations. With regard to manufacturing pro-
duction, Austria shows a one period lag vis-a-vis the euro area,
while Germany leads it by one period. This result is consistent with
ours only for just BK-filtered euro area GDP excluding Germany
and Austria. Our results mainly show a lag of the German econ-
omy to the euro area business cycle of one quarter, whereas total
euro area GDP eurGDP (including the lagging German cycle) is
coincident with the Austrian cycle.
Better comparable with our results are the ones given by Vijselaar
-Albers (2001) for GDP series instead of industrial production. Over
the whole sample period, Austrian BK-filtered GDP shows the high-
est simultaneous comovement with that of the euro area of all
countries examined by the reference study. The comovement is
especially strong in their second sub-sample covering the period
between 1987 and 1996. Focussing on Austrian GDP over the
whole sample period, no lead or lag can be observed, so that the
Austrian business cycle shows a coincident behaviour with that of
the euro area. This result is robust across both sub-samples. For the
German business cycle, represented by BK-filtered GDP, the au-
thors found again a lead of one quarter. The lag of one quarter in
the first period has changed to a two-period lead in the second
period. Again, this property is not supported by our findings irre-
spective of the filtering method and whether we look at just fil-
tered series or their common component.
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Title
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Author
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Publisher
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Location
- Frankfurt
- Date
- 2008
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Size
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Pages
- 236
- Keywords
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Categories
- International
- Recht und Politik
Table of contents
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177