Page - 150 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Image of the Page - 150 -
Text of the Page - 150 -
150
data set can also lead to different dates. This has not necessarily
to do with revisions of GDP itself, but with the seasonal adjustment
procedure. As this is usually done by an unobserved components
model or some other filtering procedure (like X12-ARIMA), past
values could be slightly revised with every new observation forth-
coming. Such marginal revisions can easily change turning point
locations, like for two of the troughs in Table 4, if growth rates are
close to zero.
Table 4: Business cycle turning points for Austria, Germany and the
euro area
Eurl 2 GDP growth
In Percent
Quarters
2Q1977 ---0.01
3Q1977 ---0.05
2Q1980 ---0.60
3Q1980 ---0. 19
4Q1980 ---0.02
2Q1982 ---0.01
3Q1982 ---0.66
4Q1982 ---0.02
2Q1992 ---0.87
3Q1992 ---0.40
4Q1992 ---0.26
1Q1993 ---0.39
2Q1993 ---0.05
Source: Own calculations.
Apart from this shift in turning points, the use of the rule of two
negative growth rates (first-order differences of logged data like in
our study) for dating troughs seems to be superior to using them in
combination with the Bry-Boschan routine like in our study. Never-
theless, this rule concentrates more on the classical cycle showing
much fewer troughs than concepts drawing explicitly on deviation
cycles.
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Title
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Author
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Publisher
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Location
- Frankfurt
- Date
- 2008
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Size
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Pages
- 236
- Keywords
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Categories
- International
- Recht und Politik
Table of contents
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177