Page - 135 - in The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
Image of the Page - 135 -
Text of the Page - 135 -
the change’s subject, as such changes would involve contrary locomotions.
This is because rectilinear locomotion in one direction and in the opposite
direction according to Phys. VIII 8 are contraries, which is also in accor-
dance with what is said in the discussion of contrary changes in Phys. V 5.58
Hence, in this case as well, a pause between the two different changes is
necessary. This implies that rectilinear locomotion from A to B and from B
to A cannot occur in one continuous stretch of time, but has to be inter-
mitted at some point.59
This, however, is very different in the case of circular motion (κυκλῷ
κίνησις) as Aristotle shows in the last part of Phys. VIII 8 (264b9–265a12).
According to Aristotle, in contrast to the other kinds of change, it is no pro-
blem to consider circular locomotion that is repeated over and over again
as one, continuous and eternal change. As we have seen, construing an eter-
nal change from any of the other kinds of change always entails the impos-
sible consequence that something x undergoes a change and in the same
time and respect also undergoes the contrary change.
According to Aristotle, the reason why it is possible for circular locomo-
tion to be eternal lies in the fact that it differs significantly from all other
types of change. Of course, locomotion on a circular path, too, needs to
have a starting point as well as an endpoint; yet, in contrast to all other
changes the starting point and the endpoint in this case are one and the
same and thus cannot be contrary to each other.60 This is made clearer by
the following diagram:
A
B A B
Fig.1
58 See Phys. VIII 7, 261b34–36, and V 5, 229b6–10.
59 Another reason that according to Aristotle shows that the change from A to B and the
one from B to A need to be contrary changes is that they annihilate each other (see Phys. VIII
8, 262a6–8).
60 See Phys. VIII 8, 264b10–11.
Locomotion alone can be one and eternal 135
ISBN Print: 9783525253069 — ISBN E-Book: 9783647253060
© 2014, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen
The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Title
- The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Author
- Sebastian Odzuck
- Editor
- Dorothea Frede
- Gisela Striker
- Publisher
- Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co
- Date
- 2014
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9783647253060
- Size
- 15.5 x 23.2 cm
- Pages
- 238
- Categories
- Geisteswissenschaften
- Naturwissenschaften Physik
Table of contents
- Acknowledgements 9
- 1. Introduction 10
- 2. The importance of the primary kind of change 14
- 3. Change in quality and quantity of living beings depends on loco-motion, but not vice versa 42
- 4. Locomotion necessarily accompanies each of the other kinds of change, but not vice versa 71
- 4.1 Overview 71
- 4.2 What changes in quantity changes with respect to place 73
- 4.3 What undergoes generation or corruption changes with respect to place 89
- 4.4 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 98
- 4.4.1 Overview 98
- 4.4.2 What does it mean that condensation and rarefaction are principles of quality? 100
- 4.4.3 Every alteration involves a change in the four basic qualities 104
- 4.4.4 Every change in the four basic qualities involves con- densation or rarefaction 108
- 4.4.5 Condensation and rarefaction are forms of aggregation and segregation 110
- 4.4.6 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 112
- 4.4.7 Conclusion 113
- 4.5 Conclusion 113
- 5. All changes depend on the first locomotion, but not vice versa 115
- 6. Locomotion has temporal priority 144
- 6.1 Overview 144
- 6.2 Locomotion has priority in time, since it is the only change eternals can undergo 146
- 6.3 Objection: Locomotion is the last of all changes in perishable things 148
- 6.4 Coming to be presupposes an earlier locomotion 150
- 6.5 The locomotion of the sun as a cause of generation 154
- 6.6 Conclusion 162
- 7. Locomotion is prior in essence 164
- 7.1 Locomotion is prior in essence, since it is last in coming to be 164
- 7.2 Locomotion alone preserves its subject’s essence 186
- 7.2.1 Overview 186
- 7.2.2 Locomotion does not change its subject’s being 188
- 7.2.3 Locomotion preserves its subject’s essence best 190
- 7.2.4 Making x depart from its essence by being part of a change in essence? 195
- 7.2.5 Change in quality or quantity in principle may result in a change in essence 202
- 7.3 Conclusion: Locomotion’s priority in essence 207
- 8. Conclusion 211
- Bibliography 220
- List of Abbreviations 223
- Index Locorum 221
- Index Nominum 223
- Index Rerum 221