Page - 219 - in The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
Image of the Page - 219 -
Text of the Page - 219 -
But my study also helps provide a deeper understanding of Aristotle’s
general theory of change. The discussion of the different arguments for
instance helped spell out specific characteristics of the four kinds of change
that to my knowledge have not been made explicit so far, but that, as we
have seen, play a crucial role in Aristotle’s general theory of change and
may be of importance for understanding other still unclear passages in Aris-
totle. For instance, it became clear that Aristotle, contrary to what one
might think, holds the view that even the non-substantial changes of altera-
tion, growth, and diminution, in a certain sense may entail a change in their
subject’s substance, while locomotion is the only type of change for which
this is not the case, since locomotion per se, as I pointed out, does not
change the inner structure of its subject in any way whatsoever.
In addition, more light was also shed on the relation in which the differ-
ent changes may stand to each other. Change in place as the primary kind
of change, for example, does not entail the involvement of any of the other
kinds, while the other kinds always involve an accompanying locomotion in
some sense. One might also conclude from my discussion that processes of
alteration are necessary constituents of growth, while the latter again may
be considered as an essential part of the coming to be of things. This might
imply that Aristotle thinks that changes that according to his own account
would form a unity in the strict sense, in a certain respect nonetheless need
to be considered as consisting of other changes as well, though without
being reducible to these constituents.
Aristotle, in discussing the priority of locomotion, therefore, not only
establishes that his theory about the eternity of change and the first
unmoved mover as the ultimate source of all change is indeed justified, but
obviously also continues to further develop and refine the general theory of
change on which the whole of Physics V–VIII works. An essential part of
this theory, as my investigation has made clear, is that change in place, i.e.
locomotion, as the most fundamental and important type of change, has a
special place among the different kinds of change and that this is what
makes it the only appropriate candidate for the change that the first
unmoved mover imparts, and that is responsible for all change in the cos-
mos. Conclusion 219
ISBN Print: 9783525253069 — ISBN E-Book: 9783647253060
© 2014, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen
The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Title
- The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Author
- Sebastian Odzuck
- Editor
- Dorothea Frede
- Gisela Striker
- Publisher
- Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co
- Date
- 2014
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9783647253060
- Size
- 15.5 x 23.2 cm
- Pages
- 238
- Categories
- Geisteswissenschaften
- Naturwissenschaften Physik
Table of contents
- Acknowledgements 9
- 1. Introduction 10
- 2. The importance of the primary kind of change 14
- 3. Change in quality and quantity of living beings depends on loco-motion, but not vice versa 42
- 4. Locomotion necessarily accompanies each of the other kinds of change, but not vice versa 71
- 4.1 Overview 71
- 4.2 What changes in quantity changes with respect to place 73
- 4.3 What undergoes generation or corruption changes with respect to place 89
- 4.4 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 98
- 4.4.1 Overview 98
- 4.4.2 What does it mean that condensation and rarefaction are principles of quality? 100
- 4.4.3 Every alteration involves a change in the four basic qualities 104
- 4.4.4 Every change in the four basic qualities involves con- densation or rarefaction 108
- 4.4.5 Condensation and rarefaction are forms of aggregation and segregation 110
- 4.4.6 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 112
- 4.4.7 Conclusion 113
- 4.5 Conclusion 113
- 5. All changes depend on the first locomotion, but not vice versa 115
- 6. Locomotion has temporal priority 144
- 6.1 Overview 144
- 6.2 Locomotion has priority in time, since it is the only change eternals can undergo 146
- 6.3 Objection: Locomotion is the last of all changes in perishable things 148
- 6.4 Coming to be presupposes an earlier locomotion 150
- 6.5 The locomotion of the sun as a cause of generation 154
- 6.6 Conclusion 162
- 7. Locomotion is prior in essence 164
- 7.1 Locomotion is prior in essence, since it is last in coming to be 164
- 7.2 Locomotion alone preserves its subject’s essence 186
- 7.2.1 Overview 186
- 7.2.2 Locomotion does not change its subject’s being 188
- 7.2.3 Locomotion preserves its subject’s essence best 190
- 7.2.4 Making x depart from its essence by being part of a change in essence? 195
- 7.2.5 Change in quality or quantity in principle may result in a change in essence 202
- 7.3 Conclusion: Locomotion’s priority in essence 207
- 8. Conclusion 211
- Bibliography 220
- List of Abbreviations 223
- Index Locorum 221
- Index Nominum 223
- Index Rerum 221