Page - 64 - in The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Image of the Page - 64 -
Text of the Page - 64 -
64
the backbone for the NBER dating procedure. The term "normally
visible in real GDP" is not only a hint at the subjectivity of this ap-
proach, but has something to do with the availability of GDP, i.e.
usually only at a quarterly frequency.
Before this dating can be done, several steps to identify the cycle
take place, which have already been described above. Despite
its subjectivity, the dates resulting from this approach are not only
the official ones, but serve as a benchmark for many innovative
new dating methods. This is probably due to the fact, that this ap-
proach is adopted by experts who can take into account specific
developments in the economy as well as in the underlying time se-
ries which could otherwise be misinterpreted if treated in a purely
mechanical way. For the same reason, Breuss ( 1984) argues in fa-
vour of a re-evaluation of identified turning points by using exter-
nal knowledge about the characteristics of time series. In case of
doubt whether a turning point is dated exactly, an ad-hoc inter-
vention should take places9•
This was probably the reason why a similar procedure has recently
been adopted for the euro area. With the formation of a currency
union in 1999, demand for a business cycle dating calendar has
emerged with a view to giving adequate guidance to economic
policy. To this end, the Centre for Economic Policy Research
(CEPR) has set up a committee similar to the one of the NBER for
determining the dates of turning points. Its definition of a recession
is quite close to that of the NBER, but accommodates for euro
area characteristics.
Unlike the NBER, the CEPR focuses on the spread between the EU
Member States, whereas the former seems to focus more on sec-
tor differences. Furthermore, the CEPR refers to quarterly instead of
monthly developments, which has to do with the fact that the
89 The author cites as an example a higher-than-usual economic activity resulting
from a front-loading of private expenditure in anticipation of a planned tax rise,
which could wrongly be interpreted as an upper turning point.
The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
- Title
- The Austrian Business Cycle in the European Context
- Author
- Marcus Scheiblecker
- Publisher
- PETER LANG - lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Location
- Frankfurt
- Date
- 2008
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-631-75458-0
- Size
- 14.8 x 21.0 cm
- Pages
- 236
- Keywords
- Economy, Wirtschaft, WIFO, Vienna
- Categories
- International
- Recht und Politik
Table of contents
- Zusammenfassung V
- Abstract IX
- List of figures and tables XV
- List of abbreviations XVII
- List of variables XIX
- 1. Research motivation and overview 1
- 2. The data 7
- 3. Methods of extracting business cycle characteristics 13
- 4. Identifying the business cycle 41
- 5. Analysing cyclical comovements
- 6. Dating the business cycle 61
- 7. Analysis of turning points 71
- 8. Results 79
- 9. Comparing results with earlier studies on the Austrian business cycle 125
- 9.1 Comparing the results with the study by Altissimo et al. (2001) 126
- 9.2 Comparing the results with the study by Monch -Uhlig (2004) 128
- 9.3 Comparing the results with the study by Cheung -Westermann (1999) 130
- 9.4 Comparing the results with the study by Brandner -Neusser (1992) 131
- 9.5 Comparing the results with the study by Forni - Hallin -Lippi -Reich/in (2000) 132
- 9.6 Comparing the results with the study by Breitung -Eickmeier (2005) 134
- 9.7 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Marcellino - Proietti (2004) 134
- 9.8 Comparing the results with the study by Vijselaar -Albers (2001) 140
- 9.9 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Zhang (1999) 142
- 9.10 Comparing the results with the study by Dickerson -Gibson -Tsakalotos (1998) 142
- 9.11 Comparing the results with the study by Artis - Krolzig - Toro (2004) 143
- 9.12 Comparing the results with the dating calendar of the CEPR 146
- 9.13 Comparing the results with the study by Breuss ( 1984) 151
- 9.14 Comparing the results with the study by Hahn - Walterskirchen ( 1992) 153
- 9.15 Comparison of the results of different dating procedures 154
- 9 .15.1 Turning point dates of the Austrian business cycle 155
- 9 .15.2 Turning point dates of the euro area business cycle 156
- 10. Concludlng remarks 161
- References 169
- Annex 177