Page - 168 - in The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
Image of the Page - 168 -
Text of the Page - 168 -
the things that are posterior in coming to be are prior in form and in
essence (e.g. man to boy and human being to seed; for the one already
has its form, and the other does not)9 (Met. IX 8, 1050a4–7)
I will call this assertion that what is posterior in coming to be is prior in
essence, the reversed priority claim. That this assumption for Aristotle in
both passages derives from the fact that everything that is coming to be
moves towards a principle, i.e. its form, is clear from the way in which the
two assumptions are connected with one another in both of the texts: in the
Physics-passage the reversed priority claim is presented as a conclusion
(ὥστε) drawn from the observation stated in sentence (1). In Met. IX 8
Aristotle justifies the reversed priority claim (ὅτι) by referring to the
incomplete’s proceeding towards its end. At least in the passage from the
Physics nothing further is said about how this assumption follows from sen-
tence (1). It also does not present a full account of what it means for x to be
prior in essence to y. Aristotle here is merely stating the first premise of the
argument for locomotion’s priority in essence and seems to presuppose that
the reader is acquainted with both the reasons for this assumption and the
notion of priority in essence.
This is not the case in the passage from the Metaphysics in which two
examples are presented to make the two points clearer. In the first example
Aristotle compares a boy and a man, in the second a seed and a human
Aristotle by τῇ φύσει πρότερον means the same as by πρότερον κατ᾽ οὐσίαν without say-
ing this explicitly. This is clear firstly from the fact that in this passage from the Physics he
uses both names for the same kind of priority (see 261a14 and 19–20), and secondly, because
this argument is introduced as one for the priority in essence of locomotion (see 260b15–19).
It is important to note that Aristotle’s understanding of πρότερον κατ᾽ ουσίαν and τῇ
φύσει, respectively, in Physics VIII is not identical with that of priority κατὰ φύσιν καὶ
οὐσίαν in Met. V 11. For one of the different ways in which something may be prior κατὰ
φύσιν καὶ οὐσίαν according to the Metaphysics is identical with the first one Aristotle pre-
sented in Phys. VIII 7, namely the one I called ontological priority (see sections 3.6 and 5.4.1).
Nevertheless, it is significant that Aristotle in Met. V 11, 1019a1–4, seems to think that prior-
ity κατ᾽ οὐσίαν is the same as priority κατὰ φύσιν, as this suggests that he in general uses
both terms in order to refer to one and the same kind of priority. This, too, supports the
assumption that in Phys. VIII 7 as well, Aristotle means the same by πρότερον κατ᾽ οὐσίαν
as by πρότερον κατὰ φύσιν. Simplicius, In Phys. 8, 1269, 10–12, however, seems to think
that Aristotle here in Phys. VIII 7 in contrast to Met. V divides (διεῖλεν) priority in essence
and in nature and treats them as independent of each other. This is clearly wrong for as I just
stated Aristotle in one and the same argument states that locomotion is shown to be prior in
nature (τῇ φύσει, 261a13–15) and in essence (κατ᾽ οὐσίαν, 261a19–20) by this argument. At
the same time, confusingly, Simplicius, as his statements on the 5th argument show (1271,
23–28), seems to be very aware of this fact.
9 τὰ τῇ γενέσει ὕστερα τῷ εἴδει καὶ τῇ οὐσίᾳ πρότερα (οἷον ἀνὴρ παιδὸς καὶ
ἄνθρωπος σπέρματος· τὸ μὲν ἤδη ἔχει τὸ εἶδος τὸ δ᾽ οὔ) (Transl. Ross with mod.).
168 Locomotion is prior in essence
ISBN Print: 9783525253069 — ISBN E-Book: 9783647253060
© 2014, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen
The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Title
- The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Author
- Sebastian Odzuck
- Editor
- Dorothea Frede
- Gisela Striker
- Publisher
- Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co
- Date
- 2014
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9783647253060
- Size
- 15.5 x 23.2 cm
- Pages
- 238
- Categories
- Geisteswissenschaften
- Naturwissenschaften Physik
Table of contents
- Acknowledgements 9
- 1. Introduction 10
- 2. The importance of the primary kind of change 14
- 3. Change in quality and quantity of living beings depends on loco-motion, but not vice versa 42
- 4. Locomotion necessarily accompanies each of the other kinds of change, but not vice versa 71
- 4.1 Overview 71
- 4.2 What changes in quantity changes with respect to place 73
- 4.3 What undergoes generation or corruption changes with respect to place 89
- 4.4 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 98
- 4.4.1 Overview 98
- 4.4.2 What does it mean that condensation and rarefaction are principles of quality? 100
- 4.4.3 Every alteration involves a change in the four basic qualities 104
- 4.4.4 Every change in the four basic qualities involves con- densation or rarefaction 108
- 4.4.5 Condensation and rarefaction are forms of aggregation and segregation 110
- 4.4.6 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 112
- 4.4.7 Conclusion 113
- 4.5 Conclusion 113
- 5. All changes depend on the first locomotion, but not vice versa 115
- 6. Locomotion has temporal priority 144
- 6.1 Overview 144
- 6.2 Locomotion has priority in time, since it is the only change eternals can undergo 146
- 6.3 Objection: Locomotion is the last of all changes in perishable things 148
- 6.4 Coming to be presupposes an earlier locomotion 150
- 6.5 The locomotion of the sun as a cause of generation 154
- 6.6 Conclusion 162
- 7. Locomotion is prior in essence 164
- 7.1 Locomotion is prior in essence, since it is last in coming to be 164
- 7.2 Locomotion alone preserves its subject’s essence 186
- 7.2.1 Overview 186
- 7.2.2 Locomotion does not change its subject’s being 188
- 7.2.3 Locomotion preserves its subject’s essence best 190
- 7.2.4 Making x depart from its essence by being part of a change in essence? 195
- 7.2.5 Change in quality or quantity in principle may result in a change in essence 202
- 7.3 Conclusion: Locomotion’s priority in essence 207
- 8. Conclusion 211
- Bibliography 220
- List of Abbreviations 223
- Index Locorum 221
- Index Nominum 223
- Index Rerum 221