Page - 135 - in Charge Transport in DNA - Insights from Simulations

BIBLIOGRAPHY andM.Orozco. Refinement of theAMBER forcefield for nucleic acids: Im- proving thedescriptionofα/γ conformers. Biophys. J.,2007. 92,3817–3829. [114] J.Åqvist. Ion–Water InteractionPotentialsDerived fromFree-EnergyPertur- bationSimulations. J. Phys.Chem.,1990. 94,21,8021–8024. [115] AmberTools1.4,2010. Http://ambermd.org. [116] F. Ryjácˇek. Ambconv, 2002. Http://www.gromacs.org/ Down- loads/User_contributions/Other_software. [117] B. Hess, H. Bekker, H. J. C. Berendsen, and J. G. E. M. Fraaije. LINCS: A linear constraint solver formolecular simulations. J.Comput.Chem.,1997. 18, 12,1463–1472. [118] D. vander Spoel, E. Lindahl, B.Hess,G.Groenhof,A. E.Mark, andH. J. C. Berendsen. GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem., 2005. 26, 1701–1718. [119] B.Hess, C.Kutzner,D. vander Spoel, andE. Lindahl. GROMACS 4: Algo- rithms forhighlyefficient, load-balanced, andscalablemolecular simulation. J.Chem.TheoryComput.,2008. 4,3,435–447. [120] P.Hobza,M. Kabelácˇ, J. Šponer, P.Mejzlík, and J. Vondrášek. Performance of empirical potentialsAMBER,CFF95, CVFF,CHARMM,OPLS, POLTEV), semiempirical quantumchemicalmethods (AM1,MNDO/M,PM3), and ab initioHartree–Fockmethod for interactionofDNAbases: Comparisonwith nonempirical beyond Hartree–Fock results. J. Comput. Chem., 1997. 18, 9, 1136–1150. [121] M. Zgarbová, M.Otyepka, J. Šponer, P. Hobza, and P. Jurecˇka. Large-scale compensation of errors in pairwise-additive empirical force fields: compar- ison ofAMBER intermolecular termswith rigorousDFT-SAPT calculations. Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys.,2010. 12,35,10476–10493. [122] M. Rueda, S. G. Kalko, F. J. Luque, andM.Orozco. The Structure andDy- namicsofDNAin theGasPhase. J.Am.Chem.Soc.,2003. 125,26,8007–8014. [123] A.Voityuk. Fluctuationof theelectronic coupling inDNA:Multistateversus two-statemodel. Chem.Phys. Lett.,2006. 439,162–165. 135