Seite - 27 - in The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
Bild der Seite - 27 -
Text der Seite - 27 -
understanding of φύσις as the source of change (κίνησις) in natural things,
since this was the reason for developing an understanding of what change is
in the first half of the Physics. But to understand what is φύσις as the
source of change in natural beings it is not necessary, for instance to discuss
an important question raised at the end of Phys. VI and taken up again and
discussed in full detail in Phys. VIII, namely how there could be a change
that is eternal without being composed of other changes.
This observation, but also the fact that all tasks that were laid out before
are completed at the end of Phys. IV, supports the claim that Aristotle had
good reasons for letting the first part of the eight books of Physics, i.e. the
formerly independent treatise On Nature, end with Book IV as is suggested
by the testimonies discussed above. The books On Change examine this
phenomenon not only for the sake of understanding what nature is, but, as
I will now show, present a more general theory of this phenomenon.
2.3.2 Physics V–VIII: The general analysis of change
At the beginning of Physics Book V Aristotle does not tell us anything about
his motivation for treating of the subject that he deals with in Book V and
the following books, nor does he lay out his plan for the subsequent chap-
ters. It becomes clear, however, that in the last books of the Physics he is
interested in presenting a general analysis and discussion of change and its
presupposition, a discussion that goes beyond what was said about the phe-
nomenon in the previous books. For, while On Nature primarily deals with
change only insofar as it is important in gaining an understanding of nature
as the source of the change that things have within them, the treatise On
Change aims to develop a general understanding of change as a fundamen-
tal phenomenon in the cosmos that is graspable through scientific inquiry.
This of course does not mean that the analysis of change conducted in Phys.
V–VIII does not contribute anything to a further understanding of nature,
only that change in these books is not examined primarily and merely for
the sake of understanding nature as a source of change.
In Book V Aristotle starts making preparations for this project by first of
all developing fundamental notions and drawing distinctions that are essen-
tial for working with the phenomenon of change and hence for the subse-
quent discussion. In the beginning of this book, therefore, Aristotle analyses
different ways in which things are said to change, and what factors deter-
mine every change49. He then shows that there are exactly the four different
kinds of change, namely change in quality, quantity, place, and substance
49 In Phys. V 1, 224a21–22, Aristotle explicitly points out that his starting point is every-
thing which changes (τὸ μεβάλλον πᾶν) in general.
The eight books of the Physics 27
ISBN Print: 9783525253069 — ISBN E-Book: 9783647253060
© 2014, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen
The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Titel
- The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Autor
- Sebastian Odzuck
- Herausgeber
- Dorothea Frede
- Gisela Striker
- Verlag
- Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co
- Datum
- 2014
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9783647253060
- Abmessungen
- 15.5 x 23.2 cm
- Seiten
- 238
- Kategorien
- Geisteswissenschaften
- Naturwissenschaften Physik
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Acknowledgements 9
- 1. Introduction 10
- 2. The importance of the primary kind of change 14
- 3. Change in quality and quantity of living beings depends on loco-motion, but not vice versa 42
- 4. Locomotion necessarily accompanies each of the other kinds of change, but not vice versa 71
- 4.1 Overview 71
- 4.2 What changes in quantity changes with respect to place 73
- 4.3 What undergoes generation or corruption changes with respect to place 89
- 4.4 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 98
- 4.4.1 Overview 98
- 4.4.2 What does it mean that condensation and rarefaction are principles of quality? 100
- 4.4.3 Every alteration involves a change in the four basic qualities 104
- 4.4.4 Every change in the four basic qualities involves con- densation or rarefaction 108
- 4.4.5 Condensation and rarefaction are forms of aggregation and segregation 110
- 4.4.6 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 112
- 4.4.7 Conclusion 113
- 4.5 Conclusion 113
- 5. All changes depend on the first locomotion, but not vice versa 115
- 6. Locomotion has temporal priority 144
- 6.1 Overview 144
- 6.2 Locomotion has priority in time, since it is the only change eternals can undergo 146
- 6.3 Objection: Locomotion is the last of all changes in perishable things 148
- 6.4 Coming to be presupposes an earlier locomotion 150
- 6.5 The locomotion of the sun as a cause of generation 154
- 6.6 Conclusion 162
- 7. Locomotion is prior in essence 164
- 7.1 Locomotion is prior in essence, since it is last in coming to be 164
- 7.2 Locomotion alone preserves its subject’s essence 186
- 7.2.1 Overview 186
- 7.2.2 Locomotion does not change its subject’s being 188
- 7.2.3 Locomotion preserves its subject’s essence best 190
- 7.2.4 Making x depart from its essence by being part of a change in essence? 195
- 7.2.5 Change in quality or quantity in principle may result in a change in essence 202
- 7.3 Conclusion: Locomotion’s priority in essence 207
- 8. Conclusion 211
- Bibliography 220
- List of Abbreviations 223
- Index Locorum 221
- Index Nominum 223
- Index Rerum 221