Seite - 164 - in The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
Bild der Seite - 164 -
Text der Seite - 164 -
7. Locomotion is prior in essence
7.1 Locomotion is prior in essence, since it is last in coming to be
7.1.1 Overview
The fifth way in which locomotion should be considered as the primary
kind of change is that it has priority in essence (κατ᾽ οὐσίαν) over the other
kinds of change. Aristotle presents two arguments which taken as a whole
are supposed to establish the truth of this premise. The first one shows that
locomotion has priority in essence in perishable things (7.1) and the second
argues that the same is true with respect to eternal things (7.2). I will start
with an analysis of the first argument, and after this I will turn to the second
one. The first argument is presented in the following lines:
[1] ὅλως τε φαίνεται τὸ γιγνόμενον ἀτελὲς καὶ ἐπ᾽ ἀρχὴν ἰόν, [2]
ὥστε τὸ τῇ γενέσει ὕστερον τῇ φύσει πρότερον εἶναι. [3] τελευ-
ταῖον δὲ φορὰ πᾶσιν ὑπάρχει τοῖς ἐν γενέσει. διὸ τὰ μὲν ὅλως ἀκί-
νητα τῶν ζώντων δι᾽ ἔνδειαν [τοῦ ὀργάνου], οἷον τὰ φυτὰ καὶ
πολλὰ γένη τῶν ζῷων, τοῖς δὲ τελειουμένοις ὑπάρχει. ὥστ᾽ εἰ μᾶλ-
λον ὑπάρχει φορὰ τοῖς μᾶλλον ἀπειληφόσιν τὴν φύσιν, καὶ ἡ κίν-
ησις αὕτη πρώτη τῶν ἄλλων ἄν εἴη κατ᾽ οὐσίαν (261a13–20)
[1] In general what is coming to be clearly is incomplete and proceeding
towards a principle, [2] so that what is posterior in coming to be is prior
in nature. [3] But locomotion belongs lastly to all things that are coming
to be. Because of this some of the living beings are entirely incapable of
moving due to a lack [of an organ], just as the plants and many genera of
animals, but it belongs to those which are about to attain completion.
Therefore, if locomotion rather belongs to those which have received
their nature to a higher degree, this [kind of] change would also have pri-
macy over the other [kinds] in essence
This argument aims at showing that locomotion is primary in essence,
because it is later in the development of living things than alteration,
growth, and diminution. This means, I will argue, that in living beings the
capacity to cause locomotion is prior in essence to the capacities for the
other two changes. This also finds its expression in the fact that having
locomotion is more specific for certain kinds of things and more important
ISBN Print: 9783525253069 — ISBN E-Book: 9783647253060
© 2014, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen
The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Titel
- The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Autor
- Sebastian Odzuck
- Herausgeber
- Dorothea Frede
- Gisela Striker
- Verlag
- Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co
- Datum
- 2014
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9783647253060
- Abmessungen
- 15.5 x 23.2 cm
- Seiten
- 238
- Kategorien
- Geisteswissenschaften
- Naturwissenschaften Physik
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Acknowledgements 9
- 1. Introduction 10
- 2. The importance of the primary kind of change 14
- 3. Change in quality and quantity of living beings depends on loco-motion, but not vice versa 42
- 4. Locomotion necessarily accompanies each of the other kinds of change, but not vice versa 71
- 4.1 Overview 71
- 4.2 What changes in quantity changes with respect to place 73
- 4.3 What undergoes generation or corruption changes with respect to place 89
- 4.4 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 98
- 4.4.1 Overview 98
- 4.4.2 What does it mean that condensation and rarefaction are principles of quality? 100
- 4.4.3 Every alteration involves a change in the four basic qualities 104
- 4.4.4 Every change in the four basic qualities involves con- densation or rarefaction 108
- 4.4.5 Condensation and rarefaction are forms of aggregation and segregation 110
- 4.4.6 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 112
- 4.4.7 Conclusion 113
- 4.5 Conclusion 113
- 5. All changes depend on the first locomotion, but not vice versa 115
- 6. Locomotion has temporal priority 144
- 6.1 Overview 144
- 6.2 Locomotion has priority in time, since it is the only change eternals can undergo 146
- 6.3 Objection: Locomotion is the last of all changes in perishable things 148
- 6.4 Coming to be presupposes an earlier locomotion 150
- 6.5 The locomotion of the sun as a cause of generation 154
- 6.6 Conclusion 162
- 7. Locomotion is prior in essence 164
- 7.1 Locomotion is prior in essence, since it is last in coming to be 164
- 7.2 Locomotion alone preserves its subject’s essence 186
- 7.2.1 Overview 186
- 7.2.2 Locomotion does not change its subject’s being 188
- 7.2.3 Locomotion preserves its subject’s essence best 190
- 7.2.4 Making x depart from its essence by being part of a change in essence? 195
- 7.2.5 Change in quality or quantity in principle may result in a change in essence 202
- 7.3 Conclusion: Locomotion’s priority in essence 207
- 8. Conclusion 211
- Bibliography 220
- List of Abbreviations 223
- Index Locorum 221
- Index Nominum 223
- Index Rerum 221