Seite - 222 - in The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
Bild der Seite - 222 -
Text der Seite - 222 -
Denniston, J.D. (1954). The Greek Particles. 2nd ed., Oxford.
Düring, I. (1957). Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition, Göteborg.
Flashar, H. (2004). Die Philosophie der Antike. Vol.3: Ältere Akademie, Aristoteles, Peripa-
tos, Basel.
De Haas, F.A.J. / Mansfeld, J. (eds.) (2004). Aristotle’s On Generation and Corruption I,
Oxford.
Hankinson, R.J. (1995). Science. In: Barnes, J. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle,
Cambridge.
Henry, P. / Schwyzer, H.-R. (eds.) (1951). Plotini opera. Vol.1., Leiden.
Jaeger, W. (1955). Aristoteles. Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung. 2nd ed.,
Berlin.
Kupreeva, I. (2005). Aristotle on Growth: A Study of the Argument of On Generation and
Corruption I 5. Apeiron 38, 103–160.
Lang, H.S. (1981). Aristotle’s Immaterial Mover and the Problem of Location in “Physics”
VIII. The Review of Metaphysics 35, 321–335.
Liddell, H.G. / Scott, R. / Jones, H.S. (1996). A Greek-English Lexicon. With a Revised Sup-
plement, Oxford.
Makin, S. (2003). What does Aristotle mean by Priority in Substance? Oxford Studies in
Ancient Philosophy 24, 209–238.
Mansion, A. (1946). Introduction à la Physique Aristotélicienne. 2nd ed., Paris.
Moraux, P. (1973). Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von
Aphrodisias, Berlin.
Morison, B. (2002). On Location. Aristotle’s Concept of Place, Oxford.
—.(2004). Self-motion in Physics VIII. In: Laks, A. / Rashed, M. (eds.): Aristote et le mouve-
ment des animaux: dix études sur le “De motu animalium”, Villeneuve-d’Ascq, 67–79.
—. (2010). Did Theophrastus Reject Aristotle’s Account of Place? Phronesis 55, 68–103.
Panayides, C.Y. (1999). Aristotle on the Priority of Actuality in Substance. Ancient Philoso-
phy 19, 327–344.
Peramatzis, M. (2011). Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Oxford.
Rapp, C. (2007). Aristoteles zur Einführung. 3rd ed., Hamburg.
Smyth, H.W. (1959). Greek Grammar, Cambridge/Mass.
Solmsen, F. (1960). Aristotle’s System of the Physical World. A Comparison with his Prede-
cessors, Ithaca.
—.(1961). Misplaced Passages at the End of Aristotle’s Physics. The American Journal of Phi-
lology 82, 270–282.
Wardy, R. (1990). The Chain of Change, Cambridge.
Waterlow, S. (1982). Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics. A Philosophical
Study, Oxford.
Wehrli, F. (ed.) (1955). Die Schule des Aristoteles. Texte und Kommentar. Heft VIII. Eude-
mos von Rhodos, Basel.
Wieland, W. (1992). Die aristotelische Physik. Untersuchungen über die Grundlegung der
Naturwissenschaft und die sprachliche Bedingungen der Prinzipienforschung bei Aristo-
teles. 3rd ed., Göttingen.
Witt, C. (1994). The Priority of Actuality in Aristotle. In: Charles, D. / Gill, M.L. / Scaltsas, T.
(eds.): Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Oxford, 215–228.
222 Bibliography
ISBN Print: 9783525253069 — ISBN E-Book: 9783647253060
© 2014, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen
The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Titel
- The Priority of Locomotion in Aristotle’s Physics
- Autor
- Sebastian Odzuck
- Herausgeber
- Dorothea Frede
- Gisela Striker
- Verlag
- Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co
- Datum
- 2014
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9783647253060
- Abmessungen
- 15.5 x 23.2 cm
- Seiten
- 238
- Kategorien
- Geisteswissenschaften
- Naturwissenschaften Physik
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Acknowledgements 9
- 1. Introduction 10
- 2. The importance of the primary kind of change 14
- 3. Change in quality and quantity of living beings depends on loco-motion, but not vice versa 42
- 4. Locomotion necessarily accompanies each of the other kinds of change, but not vice versa 71
- 4.1 Overview 71
- 4.2 What changes in quantity changes with respect to place 73
- 4.3 What undergoes generation or corruption changes with respect to place 89
- 4.4 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 98
- 4.4.1 Overview 98
- 4.4.2 What does it mean that condensation and rarefaction are principles of quality? 100
- 4.4.3 Every alteration involves a change in the four basic qualities 104
- 4.4.4 Every change in the four basic qualities involves con- densation or rarefaction 108
- 4.4.5 Condensation and rarefaction are forms of aggregation and segregation 110
- 4.4.6 What changes in quality changes with respect to place 112
- 4.4.7 Conclusion 113
- 4.5 Conclusion 113
- 5. All changes depend on the first locomotion, but not vice versa 115
- 6. Locomotion has temporal priority 144
- 6.1 Overview 144
- 6.2 Locomotion has priority in time, since it is the only change eternals can undergo 146
- 6.3 Objection: Locomotion is the last of all changes in perishable things 148
- 6.4 Coming to be presupposes an earlier locomotion 150
- 6.5 The locomotion of the sun as a cause of generation 154
- 6.6 Conclusion 162
- 7. Locomotion is prior in essence 164
- 7.1 Locomotion is prior in essence, since it is last in coming to be 164
- 7.2 Locomotion alone preserves its subject’s essence 186
- 7.2.1 Overview 186
- 7.2.2 Locomotion does not change its subject’s being 188
- 7.2.3 Locomotion preserves its subject’s essence best 190
- 7.2.4 Making x depart from its essence by being part of a change in essence? 195
- 7.2.5 Change in quality or quantity in principle may result in a change in essence 202
- 7.3 Conclusion: Locomotion’s priority in essence 207
- 8. Conclusion 211
- Bibliography 220
- List of Abbreviations 223
- Index Locorum 221
- Index Nominum 223
- Index Rerum 221