Page - 82 - in Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court - The Antique as Innovation, Volume 1
Image of the Page - 82 -
Text of the Page - 82 -
Chapter
282
studied in Italy—and to the printing presses of Anton Koberger and Johannes
Petreius. Several of its artists—Veit Stoss, Adam Krafft and Peter Vischer in the
late fifteenth century, Wenzel Jamnitzer in the sixteenth century—had inter-
national reputations. Printers and publishers all over the Empire employed its
engravers, and its most famous son, Albrecht Dürer, was and is rightly consid-
ered the greatest non-Italian artist of the Renaissance. Coupled to the political
stability guaranteed by its conservative patriciate, this all made Nuremberg a
place that offered a wealth of opportunities to any talented and enterprising
young man.
Again, very little is known about what Strada actually did in Nuremberg.
At the time he certainly already was occupied with his antiquarian studies fi-
nanced by Hans Jakob Fugger. Nuremberg was no unfavourable location for
such research. The wealth and intellectual interests of her citizens is best il-
lustrated by the fact that Samuel Quiccheberg, in his Inscriptiones vel tituli the-
atri amplissimi of 1565, lists no less than nineteen collectors; by no means all
of these belonged to the few old and extremely wealthy families from whose
ranks the town’s government was co-opted.31 For several of the Roman coins
described in Strada’s manuscript A.A.A. Numismatωn Antiquorum Διασκευέ a
provenance from some of these same Nuremberg collectors is given: apart
from an anonymous Paduan erudite, he mentions Johann Starck, a patrician
and member of the Council, Georg Römer, Johann Kandler and (his son?)
Georg Kandler. The Kandlers were merchants who chiefly dealt in copper and
brass from Northern Italy: sharing other interests with Strada beside numis-
matics, they probably made him feel welcome. In the first five volumes of his
Διασκευέ he in fact describes over sixty coins from their collections.32 Since
Georg Kandler was only born in 1531, Strada’s knowledge of his coins must at
least in part date from later visits to Nuremberg, but his first contacts with the
family doubtless dated from his period of residence.
The most important collection in Nuremberg, from which Strada described
about ninety coins in the Διασκευέ, belonged to the Nuremberg patrician
Willibald Imhoff (1519–1580). An almost exact contemporary of Strada’s,
Imhoff shared his interests: in an autograph inventory of his collection of 1573
he confessed that he had ‘from earliest youth onward, an innate and great
31 Quiccheberg 1565, pp. H i r. –v.; Quiccheberg knew some of these collections from his own
visits, some he owed to Hubertus Goltzius’ appendix on collectors of antiquities in his
Julius Caesar.
32 On the Διασκευέ, see Jansen 1993(a). On Georg Chanler of Kandler (Quiccheberg writes
Chonler) (1531–1600), see Wenzel Jamnitzer 1985, p. 450, cat. nr. 637.
back to the
book Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court - The Antique as Innovation, Volume 1"
Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court
The Antique as Innovation, Volume 1
- Title
- Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court
- Subtitle
- The Antique as Innovation
- Volume
- 1
- Author
- Dirk Jacob Jansen
- Publisher
- Brill
- Location
- Leiden
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-90-04-35949-9
- Size
- 15.8 x 24.1 cm
- Pages
- 572
- Categories
- Biographien
- Kunst und Kultur
Table of contents
- Preface XV
- Acknowledgements XVIII
- Acknowledgments of Financial Support Received XXI
- List of Abbreviations XXII
- Introduction: The Image—Or from Whom (Not?) to Buy a Second-Hand Car 1
- 0.1 The Portraits of Jacopo and Ottavio Strada 1
- 0.2 Why are These Portraits so Special? 4
- 0.3 Motions of the Mind 4
- 0.4 What is Known About Strada: Early Notices 9
- 0.5 Quellenkunde: Some Sources Published in the NineteenthCentury 15
- 0.6 Kulturgeschichte before World War II 19
- 0.7 Romance: Josef Svátek and the Rudolfine Legend 21
- 0.8 A (Very) Modest Place in the History of Classical Scholarship 24
- 0.9 Contemporary Scholarship 25
- 0.10 What Has Not Been Written on Jacopo Strada 37
- 0.11 Weaving the Strands Together: The Purpose of this Study 39
- 1 Early Years: Family Background, Education, Giulio Romano 45
- 2 Travel: Rome, Landshut, Nuremberg—Strada’s Connection withWenzel Jamnitzer 67
- 3 In Hans Jakob Fuggers’s Service 107
- 3.1 Hans Jakob Fugger 107
- 3.2 Fugger as a Patron and Collector 114
- 3.3 Fugger’s Employment of Strada 121
- 3.4 Architectural Patronage for the Fuggers: The DonauwörthStudiolo 134
- 3.5 Strada’s Trips to Lyon 137
- 3.6 Strada’s Contacts in Lyon: Sebastiano Serlio 149
- 3.7 Civis Romanus: Strada’s Sojourn in Rome 156
- 3.8 Commissions and Purchases: The Genesis of Strada’s Musaeum 174
- 3.9 Departure from Rome 183
- 4 Antiquario Della Sacra Cesarea Maesta: Strada’s Tasksat Court 188
- 4.1 Looking for Patronage: Strada’s Arrival at the ImperialCourt 188
- 4.2 The Controversy with Wolfgang Lazius 200
- 4.3 ‘Obwol Ir.Maj. den Strada selbst dier Zeit wol zu geprauchen’: Strada’s Tasks at Court 210
- 4.4 Indirect Sources Throwing Light on Strada’s Employment at Court 242
- 4.5 Conclusion 248
- 5 Jacopo Strada as an Imperial Architect: Background 251
- 5.1 Introduction: The Austrian Habsburgs as Patrons of Architecture 251
- 5.2 The Prince as Architect: Ferdinand I and Maximilian II asAmateurs and Patrons of Architecture 255
- 5.3 ‘Adeste Musae’: Maximilian’s Hunting Lodge and Garden in the Prater 290
- 5.4 The Imperial Residence: Status quo at Strada’s Arrival 307
- 5.5 The Architectural Infrastructure at the Imperial Court 319
- 5.6 Strada’s Competence as an Architect 331
- 6 Strada’s Role in Projects Initiated by Emperor Ferdinand I 339
- 7 An Object Lesson: Strada’s House in Vienna 367
- 8 The Munich Antiquarium 383
- 9 The Neugebäude 430
- 9.1 The Tomb of Ferdinand I and Anna in Prague; Licinio’s Paintings in Pressburg 431
- 9.2 Kaiserebersdorf and Katterburg 432
- 9.3 Sobriety versus Conspicuous Consumption 437
- 9.4 Hans Jakob Fugger’s Letter 438
- 9.5 Description of the Complex 441
- 9.6 The Personal Involvement of Emperor Maximilian II 455
- 9.7 Ottoman Influence? 463
- 9.8 Classical Sources: Roman Castrametatio and the Fortified Palace of Diocletian at Split 467
- 9.9 Classical Sources: Monuments of Ancient Rome 480
- 9.10 Contemporary Italian Architecture 489
- 9.11 Strada’s Contribution 500
- 9.12 Conclusion: Strada’s Role in the Design of the Neugebäude 507
- 10 Other Patrons of Architecture 514
- 10.1 The Courtyard of the Landhaus in Graz 514
- 10.2 The Residence for Archduke Ernest 517
- 10.3 Other Patrons: Vilém z Rožmberk 520
- 10.4 Jan Šembera Černohorský z Boskovic and BučoviceCastle 524
- 10.5 Christoph von Teuffenbach: The House in Vienna and the Castle at Drnholec 530
- 10.6 Reichard Strein von Schwarzenau and the Castle at Schwarzenau 534
- 10.7 Conclusion 542