Page - 99 - in Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court - The Antique as Innovation, Volume 1
Image of the Page - 99 -
Text of the Page - 99 -
99Travel—Wenzel
Jamnitzer
elsewhere in this book, such more or less informal mediation was one of Stra-
da’s tasks at court. It is unlikely that such mediation was limited to members
of the dynasty: Strada’s house probably functioned as an exclusive, high-class
shop for luxury objects—books, prints, works of art, antiquities—catering to
the intellectual, artistic and representative requirements of members of the
Imperial court and its many visitors. Strada’s acting as a dealer or informal rep-
resentative of Jamnitzer’s workshop must have been quite lucrative for both of
them, in view of the great importance at court of sumptuous status symbols,
including both personal jewellery—such as golden chains and medallions—
and the cups, vases and dishes intended to grace a nobleman’s dresser or Kre-
denz. The splendour of Strada’s libri di disegni indicate that his designs were
intended for patrons, rather than for the artist’s workshops: it is quite conceiv-
able that such albums functioned as catalogues from which a patron could
select the object(s) he wished Strada to order for him.
2.5.5 Strada as a Designer for Goldsmith’s Work
All together, there is sufficient direct and circumstantial evidence to accept a
very close collaboration between Jacopo Strada and Wenzel Jamnitzer. Con-
necting the data we have I think it is possible to credit Strada with a substantial
contribution to the design of at least one preserved object from Jamnitzer’s
studio: the so-called Merkelsche Tafelaufsatz preserved in the Rijksmuseum at
Amsterdam [Fig. 2.21 and cf. Figs. 2.10–2.11].71 This was made for an unknown
patron at exactly the time Strada was asking permission to engage a master or
journeyman goldsmith to work on a splendid commission for the Marquis of
Marignano. It is inconceivable that Strada and Jamnitzer, near neighbours, and
seven years later close collaborators in the project for Archduke Ferdinand,
would not have exchanged ideas about these two important commissions—if
they were in fact two: the hypothesis that the Merkelsche Tafelaufsatz is in fact
the object commissioned by the Marquis cannot be excluded.72 The Visierung
71 Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum, inc.nr. BK-17040. I am grateful to Dirk Jan Biemond, curator of
metals at the Rijksmuseum, for an interesting discussion of the Tafelaufsatz, its Visierung
and its possible connections with Jacopo Strada. On the Tafelaufsatz, see Pechstein 1974;
Wenzel Jamnitzer 1985, cat. nrs. 15 (pp. 219–221) 299 (pp. 342–342).
72 Though the Tafelaufsatz was bought ready made by the Nuremberg Council, the Coun-
cil appears not to have commissioned it—in that case their city’s coat of arms or some
other distinguishing feature might have been added. There is a real possibility that Mari-
gnano returned to Italy without actually paying for his commission—in which case the
Nuremberg Council would have helped an esteemed citizen in financial difficulties, as
well as have acquired an extremely prestigious object. A recent scientific examination
back to the
book Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court - The Antique as Innovation, Volume 1"
Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court
The Antique as Innovation, Volume 1
- Title
- Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court
- Subtitle
- The Antique as Innovation
- Volume
- 1
- Author
- Dirk Jacob Jansen
- Publisher
- Brill
- Location
- Leiden
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-90-04-35949-9
- Size
- 15.8 x 24.1 cm
- Pages
- 572
- Categories
- Biographien
- Kunst und Kultur
Table of contents
- Preface XV
- Acknowledgements XVIII
- Acknowledgments of Financial Support Received XXI
- List of Abbreviations XXII
- Introduction: The Image—Or from Whom (Not?) to Buy a Second-Hand Car 1
- 0.1 The Portraits of Jacopo and Ottavio Strada 1
- 0.2 Why are These Portraits so Special? 4
- 0.3 Motions of the Mind 4
- 0.4 What is Known About Strada: Early Notices 9
- 0.5 Quellenkunde: Some Sources Published in the NineteenthCentury 15
- 0.6 Kulturgeschichte before World War II 19
- 0.7 Romance: Josef Svátek and the Rudolfine Legend 21
- 0.8 A (Very) Modest Place in the History of Classical Scholarship 24
- 0.9 Contemporary Scholarship 25
- 0.10 What Has Not Been Written on Jacopo Strada 37
- 0.11 Weaving the Strands Together: The Purpose of this Study 39
- 1 Early Years: Family Background, Education, Giulio Romano 45
- 2 Travel: Rome, Landshut, Nuremberg—Strada’s Connection withWenzel Jamnitzer 67
- 3 In Hans Jakob Fuggers’s Service 107
- 3.1 Hans Jakob Fugger 107
- 3.2 Fugger as a Patron and Collector 114
- 3.3 Fugger’s Employment of Strada 121
- 3.4 Architectural Patronage for the Fuggers: The DonauwörthStudiolo 134
- 3.5 Strada’s Trips to Lyon 137
- 3.6 Strada’s Contacts in Lyon: Sebastiano Serlio 149
- 3.7 Civis Romanus: Strada’s Sojourn in Rome 156
- 3.8 Commissions and Purchases: The Genesis of Strada’s Musaeum 174
- 3.9 Departure from Rome 183
- 4 Antiquario Della Sacra Cesarea Maesta: Strada’s Tasksat Court 188
- 4.1 Looking for Patronage: Strada’s Arrival at the ImperialCourt 188
- 4.2 The Controversy with Wolfgang Lazius 200
- 4.3 ‘Obwol Ir.Maj. den Strada selbst dier Zeit wol zu geprauchen’: Strada’s Tasks at Court 210
- 4.4 Indirect Sources Throwing Light on Strada’s Employment at Court 242
- 4.5 Conclusion 248
- 5 Jacopo Strada as an Imperial Architect: Background 251
- 5.1 Introduction: The Austrian Habsburgs as Patrons of Architecture 251
- 5.2 The Prince as Architect: Ferdinand I and Maximilian II asAmateurs and Patrons of Architecture 255
- 5.3 ‘Adeste Musae’: Maximilian’s Hunting Lodge and Garden in the Prater 290
- 5.4 The Imperial Residence: Status quo at Strada’s Arrival 307
- 5.5 The Architectural Infrastructure at the Imperial Court 319
- 5.6 Strada’s Competence as an Architect 331
- 6 Strada’s Role in Projects Initiated by Emperor Ferdinand I 339
- 7 An Object Lesson: Strada’s House in Vienna 367
- 8 The Munich Antiquarium 383
- 9 The Neugebäude 430
- 9.1 The Tomb of Ferdinand I and Anna in Prague; Licinio’s Paintings in Pressburg 431
- 9.2 Kaiserebersdorf and Katterburg 432
- 9.3 Sobriety versus Conspicuous Consumption 437
- 9.4 Hans Jakob Fugger’s Letter 438
- 9.5 Description of the Complex 441
- 9.6 The Personal Involvement of Emperor Maximilian II 455
- 9.7 Ottoman Influence? 463
- 9.8 Classical Sources: Roman Castrametatio and the Fortified Palace of Diocletian at Split 467
- 9.9 Classical Sources: Monuments of Ancient Rome 480
- 9.10 Contemporary Italian Architecture 489
- 9.11 Strada’s Contribution 500
- 9.12 Conclusion: Strada’s Role in the Design of the Neugebäude 507
- 10 Other Patrons of Architecture 514
- 10.1 The Courtyard of the Landhaus in Graz 514
- 10.2 The Residence for Archduke Ernest 517
- 10.3 Other Patrons: Vilém z Rožmberk 520
- 10.4 Jan Šembera Černohorský z Boskovic and BučoviceCastle 524
- 10.5 Christoph von Teuffenbach: The House in Vienna and the Castle at Drnholec 530
- 10.6 Reichard Strein von Schwarzenau and the Castle at Schwarzenau 534
- 10.7 Conclusion 542