Page - 270 - in Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court - The Antique as Innovation, Volume 1
Image of the Page - 270 -
Text of the Page - 270 -
Chapter
5270
35 First published in Schönherr 1876; JdKH 11, 1890, ii, p. clv, Regest 7143; discussed in
Lippmann 2001, p. 117; and Simons 2009, p.105. The other passages stressing Archduke
Ferdinand’s participation read: <in 1555> ‘Hat disen stain legt vnd fundirt / Das werk er-
dacht vnd circulirt / Mit seiner tuyren rechten hant / Von Oesterreich erzherzog Ferdi-
nand’ and: ‘<On 27 June 1555> haben der durchlauchtigiste, hochgeborn fürst vnd herr,
herr Ferdinand, erzherzog zu Osterreich <…> gegenwurtig werk selbst erdacht, mit aigner
hand abgmessen vnd circulirt, den ersten stain in das fundament gelegt, demselben werk
den namen zum Gulden Stern gegeben vnd [es] damit geeret’.
36 önb-hs, Cod. min. 108. The set consists of plans of all floors and a section (no elevation);
both their character, their state of preservation and the Italian inscription on the first
plan strongly suggest that it was intended to document the design for posterity; perhaps
it was made on the occasion of the laying of the foundation stone the inscription refers
to, or of the completion of the building.
37 Below we shall encounter some other examples of the topos—derived from classical
sources—presenting a prince designing something or planting a tree etc. ‘with his own
hand’. This may incline one to think that Ferdinand’s inscriptions were mere variations on
the topos and therefore must necessarily have been false. But that seems unlikely: carv-
ing a deliberate untruth into stone—or even just to write it down—for posterity to read
Abgemessen, gemacht und circulirt
Darzu mit ersten stain fundirt
Von einem fürsten lobeleich
Ferdinand, erzherzog von Osterreich. Its proportions were decided, it was designed and drawn
with compasses / And then its foundation stone was laid
/ By a laudable prince /
Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria.
The contention that the Archduke actually made the measured drawings
for the building is repeated in the other rhymes, as well as in the Latin epi-
gram and in the German prose text, one of which was probably intended to
be inscribed in a stone commemorating the foundation of the building.35 The
contemporary drawings of Hvězda that have been preserved are presenta-
tion drawings and are probably not in Archduke Ferdinand’s own hand [Figs.
5.22–5.24; 5.55].36 Technically, the elementary geometry and proficiency in the
use of ruler and compasses as taught in the humanist curriculum, would have
been sufficient to sketch the basic concept worked out in these designs, when
coupled to some interest in architecture. The Archduke certainly possessed
this interest, witness the very idiosyncratic character of the building he com-
missioned. So unless concrete evidence to the contrary would come to light,
there is no reason to doubt that Ferdinand was responsible for the concept of
this unusual building, including its proportional system. Of course this does
not imply that he would have designed it without professional help and that he
himself would have made—or even could have made—the detailed working
drawings necessary to construct it.37
back to the
book Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court - The Antique as Innovation, Volume 1"
Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court
The Antique as Innovation, Volume 1
- Title
- Jacopo Strada and Cultural Patronage at the Imperial Court
- Subtitle
- The Antique as Innovation
- Volume
- 1
- Author
- Dirk Jacob Jansen
- Publisher
- Brill
- Location
- Leiden
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-90-04-35949-9
- Size
- 15.8 x 24.1 cm
- Pages
- 572
- Categories
- Biographien
- Kunst und Kultur
Table of contents
- Preface XV
- Acknowledgements XVIII
- Acknowledgments of Financial Support Received XXI
- List of Abbreviations XXII
- Introduction: The Image—Or from Whom (Not?) to Buy a Second-Hand Car 1
- 0.1 The Portraits of Jacopo and Ottavio Strada 1
- 0.2 Why are These Portraits so Special? 4
- 0.3 Motions of the Mind 4
- 0.4 What is Known About Strada: Early Notices 9
- 0.5 Quellenkunde: Some Sources Published in the NineteenthCentury 15
- 0.6 Kulturgeschichte before World War II 19
- 0.7 Romance: Josef Svátek and the Rudolfine Legend 21
- 0.8 A (Very) Modest Place in the History of Classical Scholarship 24
- 0.9 Contemporary Scholarship 25
- 0.10 What Has Not Been Written on Jacopo Strada 37
- 0.11 Weaving the Strands Together: The Purpose of this Study 39
- 1 Early Years: Family Background, Education, Giulio Romano 45
- 2 Travel: Rome, Landshut, Nuremberg—Strada’s Connection withWenzel Jamnitzer 67
- 3 In Hans Jakob Fuggers’s Service 107
- 3.1 Hans Jakob Fugger 107
- 3.2 Fugger as a Patron and Collector 114
- 3.3 Fugger’s Employment of Strada 121
- 3.4 Architectural Patronage for the Fuggers: The DonauwörthStudiolo 134
- 3.5 Strada’s Trips to Lyon 137
- 3.6 Strada’s Contacts in Lyon: Sebastiano Serlio 149
- 3.7 Civis Romanus: Strada’s Sojourn in Rome 156
- 3.8 Commissions and Purchases: The Genesis of Strada’s Musaeum 174
- 3.9 Departure from Rome 183
- 4 Antiquario Della Sacra Cesarea Maesta: Strada’s Tasksat Court 188
- 4.1 Looking for Patronage: Strada’s Arrival at the ImperialCourt 188
- 4.2 The Controversy with Wolfgang Lazius 200
- 4.3 ‘Obwol Ir.Maj. den Strada selbst dier Zeit wol zu geprauchen’: Strada’s Tasks at Court 210
- 4.4 Indirect Sources Throwing Light on Strada’s Employment at Court 242
- 4.5 Conclusion 248
- 5 Jacopo Strada as an Imperial Architect: Background 251
- 5.1 Introduction: The Austrian Habsburgs as Patrons of Architecture 251
- 5.2 The Prince as Architect: Ferdinand I and Maximilian II asAmateurs and Patrons of Architecture 255
- 5.3 ‘Adeste Musae’: Maximilian’s Hunting Lodge and Garden in the Prater 290
- 5.4 The Imperial Residence: Status quo at Strada’s Arrival 307
- 5.5 The Architectural Infrastructure at the Imperial Court 319
- 5.6 Strada’s Competence as an Architect 331
- 6 Strada’s Role in Projects Initiated by Emperor Ferdinand I 339
- 7 An Object Lesson: Strada’s House in Vienna 367
- 8 The Munich Antiquarium 383
- 9 The Neugebäude 430
- 9.1 The Tomb of Ferdinand I and Anna in Prague; Licinio’s Paintings in Pressburg 431
- 9.2 Kaiserebersdorf and Katterburg 432
- 9.3 Sobriety versus Conspicuous Consumption 437
- 9.4 Hans Jakob Fugger’s Letter 438
- 9.5 Description of the Complex 441
- 9.6 The Personal Involvement of Emperor Maximilian II 455
- 9.7 Ottoman Influence? 463
- 9.8 Classical Sources: Roman Castrametatio and the Fortified Palace of Diocletian at Split 467
- 9.9 Classical Sources: Monuments of Ancient Rome 480
- 9.10 Contemporary Italian Architecture 489
- 9.11 Strada’s Contribution 500
- 9.12 Conclusion: Strada’s Role in the Design of the Neugebäude 507
- 10 Other Patrons of Architecture 514
- 10.1 The Courtyard of the Landhaus in Graz 514
- 10.2 The Residence for Archduke Ernest 517
- 10.3 Other Patrons: Vilém z Rožmberk 520
- 10.4 Jan Šembera Černohorský z Boskovic and BučoviceCastle 524
- 10.5 Christoph von Teuffenbach: The House in Vienna and the Castle at Drnholec 530
- 10.6 Reichard Strein von Schwarzenau and the Castle at Schwarzenau 534
- 10.7 Conclusion 542