Seite - 90 - in Cyborg Mind - What Brain–Computer and Mind–Cyberspace Interfaces Mean for Cyberneuroethics

90 • Cyborg Mind 95. Leuthardt et al., ‘Evolution of Brain–Computer Interfaces’, 6; Mak and Wolpaw, ‘Clinical Applications of Brain–Computer Interfaces’, 192. 96. Tracey, ‘Neural Interfaces and Brain Interference’. 97. Donoghue et al., ‘Development of Neuromotor Prostheses for Humans. 98. Spinney, ‘Hear My Voice’. 99. Moore, Enhancing Me, 95. 100. Kennedy et al., ‘Direct Control of a Computer from the Human Central Nervous System’. 101. Kennedy et al., ‘Computer Control Using Human Intracortical Local Field Potentials’; Kennedy and Bakay, ‘Restoration of Neural Output from a Paralyzed Patient by a Direct Brain Connection’. 102. Mak and Wolpaw, ‘Clinical Applications of Brain–Computer Interfaces’, 192. 103. Hildt, ‘Brain–Computer Interaction and Medical Access to the Brain: Individual, Social and Ethical Implications’, 5; Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Novel Neurotechnologies, 31–32. 104. Andrieu, ‘Acceptance of Brain-Machine Hybirds’, 289–310. 105. Hochberg et al., ‘Neuronal Ensemble Control of Prosthetic Devices by a Human with Tetraplegia’. See also Kennedy et al, ‘Using Human Extra-Cortical Local Field Potentials to Control a Switch’. 106. Simeral et al., ‘Neural Control of Cursor Trajectory and Click’. 107. BrainGate™. Retrieved 13 October 2018 from http://www.braingate.com. 108. Tracey, ‘Neural Interfaces and Brain Interference’. 109. Ibid. 110. White, ‘Brave New World’. 111. Moor, Enhancing Me, 97. 112. Mak and Wolpaw, ‘Clinical Applications of Brain–Computer Interfaces’, 191. 113. Tracey, ‘Neural Interfaces and Brain Interference’. 114. Thomson, ‘Being in a Robot’s Shoes’. 115. Virtual Embodiment and Robotic Re-embodiment Project. Retrieved 13 October 2018 from http://www.vereproject.eu. 116. Clark, ‘Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence’, 105. 117. Ibid, 108. 118. Glover, 1988, I: The Philosophy and Psychology of Personal Identity, 74; quoted in Clark, ‘Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence’, 131. 119. Coyle et al., ‘Enabling Control’; Cruse et al., ‘Bedside Detection of Awareness in the Vegetative State’. 120. Chan and Harris, ‘Neuroethics’, 78–79. 121. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Novel Neurotechnologies, 34–35; Owen et al., ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’. 122. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Novel Neurotechnologies, 10. 123. Hatsopoulos and Donoghue, ‘The Science of Neural Interface Systems’; Hochberg et al., ‘Neuronal Ensemble Control of Prosthetic Devices by a Human with Tetraplegia’. 124. Mak and Wolpaw, ‘Clinical Applications of Brain–Computer Interfaces: Current State and Future Prospects’, 197. 125. University College London, ‘Julie Hill’. 126. Capogrosso et al., ‘A Brain–Spine Interface Alleviating Gait Deficits after Spinal Cord Injury in Primates’. This open access edition has been made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license thanks to the support of Knowledge Unlatched. Not for resale.